[council] Motion re Extension of Public Comment Periods

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Wed Nov 5 08:20:03 UTC 2008


I do not believe it is a good idea to suspend comment periods.  Just
make sure they are longer.
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Affonso
Pereira de Souza
	Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:10 AM
	To: GNSO Council
	Subject: Re: [council] Motion re Extension of Public Comment
Periods
	
	
	Agreed. Thats why we could work with "suspend" as to indicate
that as soon as the meeting starts the clock stops running for comment
periods.
	
	
	
	2008/11/5 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>
	

		I am not sure we should restrict it to only comment
periods that would end during an ICANN meeting.  It seems to me that any
comment period that overlaps an ICANN meeting should be extended.
		 
		Chuck


________________________________

			
			From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
			
			Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:48 AM
			To: 'GNSO Council'
			Subject: RE: [council] Motion re Extension of
Public Comment Periods
			
			

			Thanks all for considering this late-breaking
motion.  Here is an amended version of the "Resolved" paragraph -- to
clarify 'extension' vs. 'suspension...

			 

			RESOLVED:

			 

			The GNSO Council strongly urges ICANN Staff to
extend, for seven days, any public comment periods which would otherwise
end during the seven days of an ICANN meeting.

			 

			 

			 

			
________________________________


			From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
			Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:46 PM
			To: GNSO Council
			Subject: [council] Motion re Suspension of
Public Comment Periods

			 

			Hi all:  several Councilors would like to
introduce and pass this motion today, whilst we have several different,
significant and ongoing public comment periods.  Therefore I make the
motion...

			 

			Whereas, ICANN's meetings require the full
attention of GNSO Councilors and many other GNSO participants.

			 

			Whereas, ICANN has many ongoing public comment
periods of significant interest to many GNSO Councilors and
participants.

			 

			Whereas, ICANN's typical comment periods are
already difficult for many members of the ICANN community, particularly
those that must consult with members of their Constituency and/or member
organization(s).

			 

			RESOLVED:

			 

			The GNSO Council strongly urges ICANN Staff to
extend all public comment periods which would otherwise end during an
ICANN meeting, for seven days.

			 

			Mike Rodenbaugh

			Rodenbaugh Law

			PO Box 7775 #55819

			San Francisco, CA  94120

			+1.415.254.4590

			 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20081105/c5703716/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list