[council] Motion re Extension of Public Comment Periods

[Gomes, Chuck]

Looks good to me.
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
	Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:17 AM
	To: 'GNSO Council'
	Subject: RE: [council] Motion re Extension of Public Comment
Periods
	
	

	Thanks Kristina, Chuck and Carlos for the comments with which I
agree.  Here is v.3 of the suggested resolution language:

	RESOLVED:

	 The GNSO Council strongly urges ICANN Staff to extend, for
seven days, any public comment periods which overlap with any of the
seven days of an ICANN meeting.

	 

	
________________________________


	From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Affonso
Pereira de Souza
	Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 12:10 AM
	To: GNSO Council
	Subject: Re: [council] Motion re Extension of Public Comment
Periods

	 

	Agreed. Thats why we could work with "suspend" as to indicate
that as soon as the meeting starts the clock stops running for comment
periods.
	
	

	2008/11/5 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>

	I am not sure we should restrict it to only comment periods that
would end during an ICANN meeting.  It seems to me that any comment
period that overlaps an ICANN meeting should be extended.

	 

	Chuck

		 

		
________________________________


		From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh

		Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:48 AM
		To: 'GNSO Council'
		Subject: RE: [council] Motion re Extension of Public
Comment Periods

		Thanks all for considering this late-breaking motion.
Here is an amended version of the "Resolved" paragraph -- to clarify
'extension' vs. 'suspension...

		 

		RESOLVED:

		 

		The GNSO Council strongly urges ICANN Staff to extend,
for seven days, any public comment periods which would otherwise end
during the seven days of an ICANN meeting.

		 

		 

		 

		
________________________________


		From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
		Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:46 PM
		To: GNSO Council
		Subject: [council] Motion re Suspension of Public
Comment Periods

		 

		Hi all:  several Councilors would like to introduce and
pass this motion today, whilst we have several different, significant
and ongoing public comment periods.  Therefore I make the motion...

		 

		Whereas, ICANN's meetings require the full attention of
GNSO Councilors and many other GNSO participants.

		 

		Whereas, ICANN has many ongoing public comment periods
of significant interest to many GNSO Councilors and participants.

		 

		Whereas, ICANN's typical comment periods are already
difficult for many members of the ICANN community, particularly those
that must consult with members of their Constituency and/or member
organization(s).

		 

		RESOLVED:

		 

		The GNSO Council strongly urges ICANN Staff to extend
all public comment periods which would otherwise end during an ICANN
meeting, for seven days.

		 

		Mike Rodenbaugh

		Rodenbaugh Law

		PO Box 7775 #55819

		San Francisco, CA  94120

		+1.415.254.4590

		 

	 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20081105/5e87e370/attachment.html>