[council] ccNSO Liaison

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I suppose if no one in the council objects, it could be done this way.  
I think given the many topics we have in common or at at least  
touching, the sooner we get the liaison established the better.

On the other hand I need to hear from Mike whether he volunteered for  
consideration in time and I just missed it.  If so, then I will need  
to ask Glen to set up the voting mechanism.

thanks

a.

On 29 Oct 2008, at 11:09, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> I would be okay if Olga served in an interim capacity at the ccNSO  
> meeting until we decide unless there is someone else who wants to be  
> considered for this role and then we should pick one of them to  
> serve in Cairo on an interim basis.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Greg Ruth
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:59 AM
> To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
>
> Avri,
>       I'm in favor of Olga serving in this capacity, too, but I  
> guess the Council should give some formal confirmation.  Were you  
> hoping that our liaison would participate in the Cairo ccNSO  
> meetings?  Could this be done informally by Olga before she is  
> confirmed?
> Greg
> From: Avri Doria <avri at psg.com>
> To: Council GNSO <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:16:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This hadn't been my plan, but can certainly do so if this is what is
> council members want to do.
>
> a.
>
> On 29 Oct 2008, at 08:02, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > Avri,
> >
> > I am personally fine with Olga serving as GNSO Council liaison to  
> the
> > ccNSO but I do think that we should confirm the decision in our
> > meeting
> > next Wednesday in Cairo and assume that is your plan.  This is
> > especially important because most Councilors will be traveling some
> > time
> > this week.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
> >> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 7:33 AM
> >> To: Council GNSO
> >> Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have received the name of one interested council member:
> >> Olga Cavalli.
> >>
> >> As mentioned below, I request that anyone who objects to
> >> appointing Olga to the liaison role, please let me know
> >> before the end of the week (31 Oct).  If I receive an
> >> objection, I will ask that Glen set up
> >> the voting mechanism for majority confirmation of Olga in
> >> this role.
> >> If I receive no objections, I will inform this list and the
> >> ccNSO chair of our appointment..
> >>
> >> While we did not discuss this I recommend that this role,
> >> like other roles, be one that nis chosen on a yearly basis.
> >> As we  resolve the issues of the election of GNSO chair in
> >> the bi-cameral setup, I suggest that we can also cover the
> >> election of other Council wide roles such as this one.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> a.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27 Oct 2008, at 13:52, Avri Doria wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have sent the letter to Chris, ccNSO chair, as approved
> >> in the last
> >>> meeting.
> >>>
> >>> Additionally, I have received the name of one council member who  
> is
> >>> interested in taking on this task.  I ask anyone else who wishes  
> to
> >>> be considered to send me their name in the next 24 hours.
> >> i will
> >>> send out the name of the candidates once the 24 hours period has
> >>> ended.
> >>>
> >>> As we discussed in the meeting, if I receive more then one name, I
> >>> will ask Glen to setup a formal vote.  If I only have one
> >> name, I will
> >>> ask for anyone who objects to the appointment of the named council
> >>> member to send me email indicating that objection.  If we have an
> >>> objection, then I will call for an election process on the single
> >>> individual where people will have the opportunity to vote for or
> >>> against that person.  Majority in favor will be required for
> >>> appointment in any election process.
> >>>
> >>> thanks
> >>> a.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>