[council] ccNSO Liaison

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I am sorry I do not seem to have received it.

If I understand correctly, you are withdrawing that and allowing Olga  
to stand as the single candidate.

I think a liaison to SSAC is a good idea.  We should talk about this  
in council and consult with SSAC on the idea.

thanks

a.

On 29 Oct 2008, at 13:38, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

> I had sent you a msg Mon as i thought you had asked.  But i am good  
> with Olga in this role.
>
> Our new SC's should consider defining these roles ideally.  We  
> should also have one for SSAC, and i would volunteer as liason.
>
> Thx,
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> Rodenbaugh Law
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria <avri at psg.com>
>
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:58:16
> To: Council GNSO<council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I suppose if no one in the council objects, it could be done this way.
> I think given the many topics we have in common or at at least
> touching, the sooner we get the liaison established the better.
>
> On the other hand I need to hear from Mike whether he volunteered for
> consideration in time and I just missed it.  If so, then I will need
> to ask Glen to set up the voting mechanism.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
> On 29 Oct 2008, at 11:09, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
>> I would be okay if Olga served in an interim capacity at the ccNSO
>> meeting until we decide unless there is someone else who wants to be
>> considered for this role and then we should pick one of them to
>> serve in Cairo on an interim basis.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org
>> ] On Behalf Of Greg Ruth
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:59 AM
>> To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
>> Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
>>
>> Avri,
>>      I'm in favor of Olga serving in this capacity, too, but I
>> guess the Council should give some formal confirmation.  Were you
>> hoping that our liaison would participate in the Cairo ccNSO
>> meetings?  Could this be done informally by Olga before she is
>> confirmed?
>> Greg
>> From: Avri Doria <avri at psg.com>
>> To: Council GNSO <council at gnso.icann.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:16:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This hadn't been my plan, but can certainly do so if this is what is
>> council members want to do.
>>
>> a.
>>
>> On 29 Oct 2008, at 08:02, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>
>>> Avri,
>>>
>>> I am personally fine with Olga serving as GNSO Council liaison to
>> the
>>> ccNSO but I do think that we should confirm the decision in our
>>> meeting
>>> next Wednesday in Cairo and assume that is your plan.  This is
>>> especially important because most Councilors will be traveling some
>>> time
>>> this week.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
>>>> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 7:33 AM
>>>> To: Council GNSO
>>>> Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have received the name of one interested council member:
>>>> Olga Cavalli.
>>>>
>>>> As mentioned below, I request that anyone who objects to
>>>> appointing Olga to the liaison role, please let me know
>>>> before the end of the week (31 Oct).  If I receive an
>>>> objection, I will ask that Glen set up
>>>> the voting mechanism for majority confirmation of Olga in
>>>> this role.
>>>> If I receive no objections, I will inform this list and the
>>>> ccNSO chair of our appointment..
>>>>
>>>> While we did not discuss this I recommend that this role,
>>>> like other roles, be one that nis chosen on a yearly basis.
>>>> As we  resolve the issues of the election of GNSO chair in
>>>> the bi-cameral setup, I suggest that we can also cover the
>>>> election of other Council wide roles such as this one.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> a.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27 Oct 2008, at 13:52, Avri Doria wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have sent the letter to Chris, ccNSO chair, as approved
>>>> in the last
>>>>> meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Additionally, I have received the name of one council member who
>> is
>>>>> interested in taking on this task.  I ask anyone else who wishes
>> to
>>>>> be considered to send me their name in the next 24 hours.
>>>> i will
>>>>> send out the name of the candidates once the 24 hours period has
>>>>> ended.
>>>>>
>>>>> As we discussed in the meeting, if I receive more then one name, I
>>>>> will ask Glen to setup a formal vote.  If I only have one
>>>> name, I will
>>>>> ask for anyone who objects to the appointment of the named council
>>>>> member to send me email indicating that objection.  If we have an
>>>>> objection, then I will call for an election process on the single
>>>>> individual where people will have the opportunity to vote for or
>>>>> against that person.  Majority in favor will be required for
>>>>> appointment in any election process.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> a.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>