[council] Draft comment to the Draft IDN ccTLD Fast Track Implementation Plan Rev2

[Tim Ruiz]

I support it as well (as edited). There is one correct to the grammar
that I suggest. In the last sentence of the second bullet under the
second paragraph of the document:

Identification of this issues is...

should be

Identification of these issues is...


Tim 
 
  -------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Draft comment to the Draft IDN ccTLD Fast Track
Implementation Plan Rev2
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>
Date: Thu, March 26, 2009 6:15 pm
To: "Edmon Chung" <edmon at dotasia.org>, "Council GNSO"
<council at gnso.icann.org>

Thanks Edmon for preparing this. I made some suggested edits that are
highlighted in the attached file that I believe do not change the
substantive meaning of what you prepared; please confirm that that is
true or, if not, suggest additional edits.

With the edits, I support this as a GNSO statement. As Edmon states in
the document, it is consistent with previous GNSO statements approved by
the Council.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 3:25 PM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: [council] Draft comment to the Draft IDN ccTLD Fast 
> Track Implementation Plan Rev2
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> Apologies for the delay of circulating this. Please see 
> attached the draft comment as discussed during our wrap up 
> meeting in Mexico.
> 
> The comment basically applauds ICANN staff of the progress on 
> the process and highlights a few points:
> 1. the consideration of variants for IDN TLDs 2. the 
> identification of need for a formalized relationship between 
> ICANN and the IDN ccTLD manager 3. the recognition that 
> financial contribution should be required from IDN ccTLD 
> managers to offset its program costs
> 
> And then reiterates our resolution in January 2009 pertaining 
> the subject.
> 
> As a reminder, the comment period closes April 6 2009, 
> therefore we still have a bit more than a week to consider 
> the comments before submitting.
> 
> Edmon
> 
> 
>