[council] Comments in relation with GNSO travel funding and policy

[Gomes, Chuck]

Philip,
 
First of all the suggestion was personal and not from the RyC as I
stated.  Secondly, I don't have a clue as to why you object.  Please
explain.  I don't think there was any of my edits that that suggested
that constituencies should not receive equitable treatment.  If there
is, I would agree that it needs to be fixed.
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
	Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 11:13 AM
	To: 'GNSO Council'
	Subject: RE: [council] Comments in relation with GNSO travel
funding and policy
	
	
	The BC profoundly objects to the proposed change of
"constituencies" to "stakeholder groups" suggested by the RyC.
	 
	Any new constituency must be approved by the Board.
	It is therefore legitimate.
	It therefore deserves equitable treatment.
	 
	Philip
	 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20090327/f2b73213/attachment.html>