[council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting

William Drake william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
Mon Oct 5 06:36:43 UTC 2009


Hi,

I strongly agree with Stéphane and others that a probing discussion of  
GAC's role under the AoC is needed, maybe a 505/50 time split.

Cheers,

Bill


On Oct 5, 2009, at 1:17 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

>
> I agree with Stéphane's second comment (discussing the Affirmation).
>
> What benefit could we possibly get out of discussing the DAG v3 with  
> them? We will know their opinion as they will make it public. I have  
> not found discussing the new gTLD's any benefit in the past and  
> can't see it changing.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- 
> council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Monday, 5 October 2009 2:17 AM
> To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting
>
> Thanks Avri.
>
> The DAGv3 is obviously a topic of major interest. We may also wish  
> to ask
> the GAC to tell us how they see their larger role within ICANN as a  
> result
> of the Affirmation...
>
> Stéphane
>
>
> Le 04/10/09 13:34, « Avri Doria » <avri at acm.org> a écrit :
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thsi topic suggested by the chair of GAC is:
>>
>> *             Meeting with GNSO Council
>> ·               New gTLD policy implementation (DAG v3)
>>
>>
>> He is open to other topics if we would like to suggest one.
>>
>> Is the council ok with it, or would we prefer some other topic?
>>
>> thanks
>> a.
>>
>>
>

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
  Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************






More information about the council mailing list