[council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams
cgomes at verisign.com
Thu Feb 18 22:34:59 UTC 2010
That should have said "response" not "request".
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:28 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams
Note the request from Janis regarding Kristina's question in today's Council meeting.
From: Janis Karklins [mailto:janis.karklins at icann.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:20 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Peter Dengate-Thrush'
Cc: 'Marco Lorenzoni'; 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; 'Cavalli, Olga'
Subject: RE: AoC A&T Review Teams
I can speak for myself only: There have been comments that SO/AC chairs should abstain from presenting their candidatures to the RTs.
There isn’t any formal provision which would prevent chairs to be candidates. Especially, when the Chair of the GAC is a member of the RT ex officio.
In order to ensure equal treatment of all Chairs, I am seriously considering to nominate somebody to represent me in the RT. This is, of course, subject of sufficient number and quality of governmental candidates for the RTs.
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
Sent: ceturtdiena, 2010. gada 18. februārī 22:21
To: Peter Dengate-Thrush; Janis Karklins
Cc: Marco Lorenzoni; Stéphane Van Gelder; Cavalli, Olga
Subject: AoC A&T Review Teams
The following question was raised in the GNSO Council meeting today regarding your final selection of AoC A&T Review Team members: Is there any anticipation that leaders in an SO or AC (councilors, chairs, etc.) would be eliminated from consideration for the RT? I stated that I was unaware of any restrictions like this, but said I would ask the two of you.
For your information, there are differences of opinion on this issue in the GNSO.
BTW, thanks for the extension of time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the council