[council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams
cgomes at verisign.com
Thu Feb 18 23:22:19 UTC 2010
Here's is Peter's reponse to Kristina's question.
From: Peter Dengate Thrush [mailto:peter.dengatethrush at icann.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:17 PM
To: Janis Karklins
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; 'Marco Lorenzoni'; "'Stéphane Van Gelder'"; 'Cavalli, Olga'
Subject: Re: AoC A&T Review Teams
endorsing what Janis has said; seems strange that the Board Chair and the GAC can, but the SO and other AC chairs cant...
I think its a question for each SO to determine, observing usual conflict of interest rules and the common sense which you and others bring to making these things work.
On 19/02/2010, at 11:20 AM, Janis Karklins wrote:
I can speak for myself only: There have been comments that SO/AC chairs should abstain from presenting their candidatures to the RTs.
There isn’t any formal provision which would prevent chairs to be candidates. Especially, when the Chair of the GAC is a member of the RT ex officio.
In order to ensure equal treatment of all Chairs, I am seriously considering to nominate somebody to represent me in the RT. This is, of course, subject of sufficient number and quality of governmental candidates for the RTs.
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
Sent: ceturtdiena, 2010. gada 18. februārī 22:21
To: Peter Dengate-Thrush; Janis Karklins
Cc: Marco Lorenzoni; Stéphane Van Gelder; Cavalli, Olga
Subject: AoC A&T Review Teams
The following question was raised in the GNSO Council meeting today regarding your final selection of AoC A&T Review Team members: Is there any anticipation that leaders in an SO or AC (councilors, chairs, etc.) would be eliminated from consideration for the RT? I stated that I was unaware of any restrictions like this, but said I would ask the two of you.
For your information, there are differences of opinion on this issue in the GNSO.
BTW, thanks for the extension of time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the council