[council] GNSO-GAC meeting in Cartagena

[Gomes, Chuck]

Bill,

Please see the attached email message that I sent to the Council list.
Note that I mentioned this in the 28 October Council meeting and
forwarded Liz's paper shortly thereafter.  Because of the 15 November
deadline for agendas and related documents for Cartagena meetings, we
could not wait until the 18 November meeting.

In a subsequent email message I communicated that both Chris and Heather
are supportive of the topic and forwarded Liz's paper to their groups.

Detailed agendas and questions are still to be developed. Your
suggestions will be helpful in that regard.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 8:23 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: GNSO Council List
> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO-GAC meeting in Cartagena
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> On Nov 17, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > Bill,
> >
> > Your suggestions fit nicely into the topic that has already been
> > selected by all three groups (GNSO, GAC & ccNSO)
> 
> Thanks, I must have missed this conversation; happily, I'm not alone
in
> that.  When did the Council discuss this?
> 
> > based on the paper that
> 
> > Liz produced regarding what needs to be done in the future regarding
> > community WGs.  It seems natural to me to talk about successes and
> > failures of the Rec6 CWG and the JAS WG as we explore how we
> facilitate
> > CWGs going forward.
> 
> Ok, but I wasn't suggesting a discussion about the procedural aspects
> of CWGs (although some time on that would be good too), but rather
> about the substantive issues and proposals involved in these two
cases.
> 
> Where's the topic specified, do we have a list of discussion questions
> per previous?
> 
> Thanks much,
> 
> Bill
> 
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-
> >> council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of William Drake
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 7:37 AM
> >> To: GNSO Council List
> >> Subject: [council] GNSO-GAC meeting in Cartagena
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On tomorrow's call we are to discuss "6.2 Topic(s) for Joint
> meetings
> >> with the GAC & ccNSO"
> >>
> >> We've just had two intensive and successful group collaborations on
> >> questions of particular interest to the GAC, namely Rec. 6/former
> MAPO
> >> and JAS/applicant support.  Wouldn't it be helpful to hear GAC
> >> perspectives and engage in some dialogue with them on a) the
outputs
> > of
> >> these groups, and how well they speak to concerns GAC has raised in
> > the
> >> past, and b) how those outputs should be dealt with going forward?
> >> Given all the efforts expended and the pressing need to settle this
> >> stuff to the community's satisfaction, one would think this is the
> > best
> >> way we could use the time.  Unless of course we'd prefer to talk
> about
> >> categories :-)
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ***********************************************************
> >> William J. Drake
> >> Senior Associate
> >> Centre for International Governance
> >> Graduate Institute of International and
> >> Development Studies
> >> Geneva, Switzerland
> >> william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
> >> www.williamdrake.org
> >> ***********************************************************
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
>  Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
> www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************************
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>
Subject: [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] draft discussion paper on cross-SO/AC working groups
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:25:26 -0500
Size: 29599
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20101117/190b795e/attachment.mht>