[council] JAS update and deadline

[Adrian Kinderis]

That should be;

Stephane,

How does it impact the tasks that are currently being worked on AND potential motions?

Adrian Kinderis
Chief Executive Officer
AusRegistry International Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian at ausregistry.com
Web: www.ausregistry.com

- Follow AusRegistry International on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ausregistryint 

The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Saturday, 20 August 2011 9:09 AM
To: William Drake; Stéphane Van Gelder
Cc: Rafik Dammak; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] JAS update and deadline


Stephane,

How does it impact the tasks that are currently being worked on potential motions?

Also, is there an impact to backing this meeting up towards the ICANN Meeting in Dakar? 

Adrian Kinderis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: Saturday, 20 August 2011 3:48 AM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder
Cc: Rafik Dammak; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] JAS update and deadline


Hi

I support moving the call back two weeks to Thursday 22 September.  We've come this far with the process, let's let them finish it properly.

Best
Bill

On Aug 19, 2011, at 18:36, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder at indom.com> wrote:

> 
> Thanks Rafik,
> 
> Councilllors, if a small push back can help the JAS WG meet the Board-requested deadlines, then in my view we should at the very least consider it. But a decision needs to be taken quickly and it needs to be very clearly stated that these are exceptional circumstances and that the Council will not alter it's calendar everytime a WG needs a little extra time.
> 
> In my conversations with the JAS cochairs and the ALAC chair on this, I have been told that pushing back our Sept 8 meeting by 15 days would give the JAS WG the time it needs to present it's final report to us.
> 
> I can, of course, also see reasons for not wanting to push our meeting back. So if anyone is very opposed to doing so, please say so by Wednesday next week so that we can take a timely decision.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Envoyé de mon iPhone4
> 
> Le 19 août 2011 à 03:38, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
>> Dear fellow-councillors,
>> 
>> while the JAS WG members are working hard on drafting the final report with all difficulties(commitment during summer holidays etc) , I am sending this email to kindly ask for consideration to push back the gnso confcall planned for 8th September (or considering special call) and also delaying for few days the deadline for finalizing the report. a webinar for icann community is also planned to make it more easy to get a  fast track on the report updates (knowing that is also another workload for WG members).helping the discussion among councillors and their respective SG/C regarding the report.
>> 
>> I will be glad to  get your feedback and answer your questions.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Rafik
>