[council] NTIA letter to ICANN

Adrian Kinderis adrian at ausregistry.com.au
Fri Jun 17 09:49:45 UTC 2011


I am not sure to what end?
Why would we discuss this?
Haven’t we already got a full agenda? Why is this particular letter so important. I am not convinced the GNSO Council is in a position to respond nor assist here...
Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu
Sent: Friday, 17 June 2011 5:45 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN

Despite the unfortunate timing (16 June) I think this is an important development and support discussing it on Saturday. We may need to have a follow up discussion, but it would be good to have at least an initial conversation as soon as possible.

Cheers
Mary

Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu<mailto:mary.wong at law.unh.edu>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From:

Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder at indom.com>

To:

GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>

Date:

6/17/2011 5:40 AM

Subject:

[council] NTIA letter to ICANN

Councillors,

For those of you that haven't seen this, here is a link to the letter NTIA has sent to ICANN re the new gTLD program.

 http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/strickling-to-dengate-thrush-16jun11-en.pdf

This is one of the topics that we could discuss during our Saturday morning session, if there is interest in doing so.

Stéphane


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110617/f234465c/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list