[council] UDRP issues report discussion
tim at godaddy.com
Sat Jun 18 23:28:34 UTC 2011
Not ignoring this request Kristina, we just want to confirm one way or
the other. But I will say that the RySG councilors do not speak for the
RrSG and I don't think that is what Jeff intended. I believe he was
referencing discussions we have had in our House, certainly not an
official position. Again, I will try to confirm an actual position.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] UDRP issues report discussion
From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette at cov.com>
Date: Sat, June 18, 2011 4:23 am
To: "'council at gnso.icann.org'" <council at gnso.icann.org>
To point out the obvious:
If, as Jeff claims, the key problem is to get the bad actor registrars
in line because the good actor registrars are doing the right thing,
amending and changing the UDRP through a PDP is not the only solution.
The other one is to amend the RAA accordingly.
Also, this is the second time that Jeff has referred to the statement
above as coming out of the registry-registrar meeting. I'd be
interested in getting confirmation from someone from the RrSG if his
characterization is accurate.
More information about the council