[council] RE: Draft Motion and Updated Final Issue Report on the Protection of the Names of International Organizations in New GTLDs
joy
joy at apc.org
Fri Oct 12 03:14:38 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Jeff:
Given the GAC origins of this, I had in mind the categorisations in
this list of observers to the UN:
http://www.un.org/en/members/intergovorg.shtml
IOC and RC are in the "other entities" category - so yes, as drafted
the motion is somewhat problematic in terms of international standards.
Also I am not sure how the term "international" fits with regional
treaties as opposed to global international ones. maybe that can come
out in a PDP.
thanks for the offer to consider friendly amendments. If i can think
of one I will offer it
Cheers
Joy
On 12/10/2012 2:59 p.m., Neuman, Jeff wrote:
>
> Joy,
>
> I am not sure I understand your question. The IOC and Red Cross
> are not IGOs or even necessarily International Organizations. So I
> felt like we needed to include them by name in case one considered
> them excluded because they did not fit neatly into those
> definitions. So, my intent (maybe it was poorly worded) was to
> include those 2 groups, not to the exclusion of others, but to make
> sure they were covered in the PDP if one did not consider those 2
> groups either an IGO or INGO.
>
> Perhaps there is better wording for my concern and I would welcome
> any friendly amendments to that end.
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: joy [mailto:joy at apc.org] Sent:
> Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:16 PM To: Glen de Saint Géry Cc:
> Neuman, Jeff; Margie Milam; council at gnso.icann.org;
> gnso-secs at icann.org Subject: Re: [council] RE: Draft Motion and
> Updated Final Issue Report on the Protection of the Names of
> International Organizations in New GTLDs
>
> thanks Glen Jeff: One question: the motion proposes specifically
> inviting a selection of 2 IGOs (IOC and Red Cross) but no INGOs. I
> couldn't find the rationale for that exclusion in the final issues
> report: it would seem fair to extend an invitation to both groups
> given the nature of the PDP proposal. Can you please clarify?
> Thank you Joy
>
> On 11/10/2012 3:53 a.m., Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
>> Dear All,
>
>
>
>> The ?clean? motion is posted on page
>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+Oct
>>
>>
>>
ober+2012
>
>
>
>
>> Final Issues Report id posted on page:
>
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/protection-igo-names.htm
>
>> and can be directly viewed at:
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/protection-igo-names-final-issue-repor
>>
>>
>>
t-01oct12-en.pdf
>
>
>
>
>> Thank you.
>
>> Kind regards,
>
>
>
>> Glen
>
>
>
>> Glen de Saint Géry
>
>> GNSO Secretariat
>
>> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>
>> http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
>
>> *From:*owner-council at gnso.icann.org
>> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Neuman, Jeff
>> *Sent:* mardi 9 octobre 2012 14:35 *To:* Margie Milam;
>> council at gnso.icann.org *Subject:* [council] RE: Draft Motion and
>> Updated Final Issue Report on the Protection of the Names of
>> International Organizations in New GTLDs
>
>
>
>> All,
>
>
>
>> In order to make sure this gets on the agenda for Toronto, please
>> consider me as the author of this motion. I have included a
>> clean and redline version of the motion. The redline compares
>> the motion to the one sent around by Margie last week.
>
>
>> Thanks.
>
>
>
>> *Jeffrey J. Neuman** **Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business
>> Affairs*
>
>
>
>> *From:*owner-council at gnso.icann.org
>> <mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org>
>> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]
>> <mailto:[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]> *On Behalf Of
>> *Margie Milam *Sent:* Monday, October 01, 2012 6:37 PM *To:*
>> council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org> *Subject:*
>> [council] Draft Motion and Updated Final Issue Report on the
>> Protection of the Names of International Organizations in New
>> GTLDs
>
>
>
>> Dear All,
>
>
>
>> Please find attached for the GNSO Council?s review and
>> consideration, a draft motion to initiate a PDP on the
>> Protection of the Names of International Organizations.
>
>
>
>> Also attached is an updated Final Issue Report. The only changes
>> relate to cleaning up the use of certain definitions (using
>> INGOs of NGOs).
>
>
>
>> Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
>
>
>
>> Best regards,
>
>
>
>> _________
>
>
>
>> Margie Milam
>
>> Senior Policy Counselor
>
>> ICANN
>
>> _________
>
>
>
>
>
>> *From:*Margie Milam *Sent:* Monday, October 01, 2012 9:53 AM
>> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>> *Subject:* Final Issue Report on the Protection of the Names of
>> International Organizations in New GTLDs
>
>
>
>> Dear All,
>
>
>
>> We are pleased to submit to the GNSO Council for its review and
>> consideration, the Final Issue Report on the Protection of the
>> Names of International Organizations in New gTLDs. This Final
>> Issue Report follows the closing of the public comment forum on
>> the Preliminary Issue Report.
>
>
>
>> We look forward to supporting the GNSO Council?s activities at
>> the Toronto Meeting with respect to this important issue.
>
>
>
>> All the Best,
>
>
>
>> Margie Milam
>
>
>
>> _________
>
>
>
>> Margie Milam
>
>> Senior Policy Counselor
>
>> ICANN
>
>> _________
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQd4seAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqa6IH/1lRJb29nDppHq7F0fjwXWqp
0/9gDo6qQPL9MEZhnVxmrTTu1GMzpKPn6ItuwjJ8ztWW8f1B4GFdjXnhrj96zhUL
pmZEoIF2tBmaTEsJzI2Jd7qnq0/huhAxhApoSDmy0SU09K7pWGZItkuljifVbK2F
9om8/HGvNxkJZ36kRQ+jGusHLER3i1C3yiQGSKKOtFWVMJWhjT31d1ZWdgCqKzlE
mrOlCSu0bHug/PUFNEghfAXaVCgH8H2/jmnHsSqxRz1YIHWwVBgsfZ6kKa2FkbLG
1hLAcbZCCVo14SQdrTEeOH2I0kZBmSspqchlFQKc0+di+colI741XHaXtyRbYdM=
=etZh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the council
mailing list