[council] FW: URS follow-up

Petter Rindforth petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu
Sun Oct 21 23:38:01 UTC 2012

Dear Jonathan and All new Colleagues, 
Just to express my interest in participate in the further work with URS
(as it seems we now have to).
I have experience as an .xxx Arbitrator and also created the Swedish ADR
Accelerated Proceeding, so I hope I can therewith add some ideas  - and
questions  - in order to have a fast as possible final solution
regarding the URS.
Petter Rindforth, LL M
Fenix Legal KB
Stureplan 4c, 4tr
114 35 Stockholm
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
E-mail: <petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu>
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals
to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client
privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read,
copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please
delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail.
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, <http://www.fenixlegal.eu/>
Thank you
On 21 okt 2012 23:44 "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>
> All,
> Please be aware of the following note from Olof Nordling when we next
> consider the URS and associated issues.
> Jonathan
> From:Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling at icann.org]
> Sent: 21 October 2012 15:33
> To: jonathan.robinson at iprota.com
> Cc: Kurt Pritz
> Subject: URS follow-up
> Dear Jonathan,
> Congratulations to your recent election as GNSO Council Chair and many
> thanks to you and to all Council members for the constructive
> discussions we had on URS matters on 18 October! The willingness to
> consider a drafting team to address URS implementation questions and
> issues is much appreciated.
> The subsequent URS session the same day in Toronto proved most
> interesting. In addition to presentations from NAF and WIPO as 
> potential URS providers, we had the advantage of a very late addition
> to the agenda – a presentation from a “new entrant”, Intersponsive,
> intending to respond to the RFI with a proposal within the target fee,
> although with some adjustments of the URS provisions. Also NAF
> clarified that they would be able to stay within the target fee,
> provided reasonable limitations could be established to the current
> translation requirements and to the number of domain names covered by
> a single complaint.
> I realize that you and other Council members couldn’t attend this
> session, as it partially overlapped with the GNSO Council session, but
> the recording is available at
> <http://audio.icann.org/meetings/toronto2012/urs-18oct12-en.mp3>.
> Furthermore, there are a number of relevant documents posted on our
> recently established URS web page at
> <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/urs>, notably contributions
> from NAF, WIPO and CAC, with considerations, proposals, some costing
> aspects and, most importantly, questions needing to be resolved (the
> NAF contribution is of particular interest in that regard).
> I believe these recent developments further clarifies the need for a
> drafting team to establish realistic implementation measures based on
> the URS text. I look forward to further contacts with you and the
> Council on this matter in the near future.
> Very best regards
> Olof
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20121022/bf0d39c6/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list