[council] Final GAC communique

Thu Nov 21 21:00:02 UTC 2013

Nonetheless it is sad and I will say that I find it interesting to show respect to the GNSO's PDP work by working on ways to engage and then completely ignore work that is done in PDPs which is relevant to what they are deliberating.

Thomas

Am 21.11.2013 um 17:17 schrieb "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>:

> 
> Remember that they never thought we should be considering this.  :(
> 
> Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Rickert
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:11 PM
> To: Glen de Saint Géry
> Cc: council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: Re: [council] Final GAC communique
> 
> 
> All, 
> sadly, the GAC communique includes Advise on IGO/INGOs, but does not mention the GNSO's PDP WG or the motion that passed.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> =============
> thomas-rickert.tel
> +49.228.74.898.0
> 
>> Am 21.11.2013 um 16:57 schrieb Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>:
>> 
>> FYI
>> 
>> Attached please find the finalised GAC communique from Buenos Aires.
>> 
>> The communique will be posted on the GAC Website later today.
>> 
>> Glen de Saint Géry
>> GNSO Secretariat
>> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>> http://gnso.icann.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <FINAL_Buenos_Aires_GAC_Communique_20131120.pdf>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gac mailing list
>> gac at gac.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20131121/0f307ac4/signature.asc>