[council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG

[Gabriela Szlak]

Dear all,

Thanks so much for the hard work on this.

Regarding the charter, I would like to ask a clarifying question on the
issue of membership of the CCWG.

The charter says:

*"Each of the chartering organizations shall appoint a minimum of 2 and a
maximum of 5 members to the working group in accordance with their own
rules and procedures"*

¿Could we clarify before the next council call what this means?

I recall a long discussion in LA on membership regarding the Charter for
the CCWG on IG so I would like to be sure we all understand the language,
as I am not sure I do, and Susan and I need to report to BC members and ask
for guidance on this topic. There is a huge amount of work to be done on
this CCWG and we believe that  diversity of expertise and viewpoints in
membership is crucial to achieve to proposed goals.

Thanks a lot,
Gabi



*Gabriela Szlak *


*Skype:* gabrielaszlak

*Twitter: @*GabiSzlak


La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.
The information in this e-mail is confidential.


2014-11-03 19:16 GMT-03:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I second the motion.
>
> As a member of the DT, I  also applaud the effort and cooperative spirit
> of the DT group.  We are getting better at starting up these CWG efforts,
> and I admit that the time we did it in looks like it may be far shorter
> than my predictions.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 04-Nov-14 05:52, Thomas Rickert wrote:
> > All,
> > please find attached for your consideration a motion considering the
> adoption of
> > the charter for the Enhancing Accountability CWG as well as the charter.
> >
> > Let me take the opportunity to applaud DT members, ICANN staff and my
> co-chair
> > Mathieu Weill on having produced the attached charter in a very short
> time span
> > in a most collaborative fashion.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUV/6yAAoJEOo+L8tCe36HjOYH/j+vXtiyf5lp1n0E7LIFunZn
> s7q1mPkXx5gIUa4gv0/mTtFba6UKntlJ+gT2g+jEjFsmq55lc1rey90cUGZt3JcF
> /9sOCA0BANmaOgPpm9rUhrdaloYZYzoUWihrjlYUdeYT9rPdwSGLY+JAMwhmTeTH
> P2tNfCQs9f+TzCtDdaApB6UMSVxxhxrFdvj0JWf41FOPtkd+wXcEJCsvxX0mgPKb
> 65lNWfr7YRa5t3LHIF/bWmfhobppk2PAeax8eWXFnsPBK6HODbRh6ndX0CWo+y4x
> Wk3PtmQFQLLi0/PtG7vg4RgtNTyp+DdSKtpqBYKQk2wP0TXbHWCYUXL0/m3GLVs=
> =bxq3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20141106/540cedbf/attachment.html>