[council] Motion for Council Meeting in Buenos Aires

[Glen de Saint Géry]

Dear Avri,

Please note this has been done.
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+24+June+2015

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: samedi 13 juin 2015 19:07
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Motion for Council Meeting in Buenos Aires


Hi,

As a participant in the group, I second the motion.

avri


On 12-Jun-15 12:48, Bret Fausett wrote:
> Dear Councillors,
>
> I am pleased to make the following motion for consideration at the next Council Meeting on 24 June 2015. A copy of the Motion with links to the referenced historical documents is attached to this email as a Word Document. I also am including as PDFs copies of the attachments. Please let me know if you have any difficulties receiving or opening the attached documents. 
>
> As a brief background, the work described in the motion and presented below in the attachments was primarily a scoping exercise, to provide a starting framework for future policy development work on new gTLDs. If we approve the motion and begin the policy process, the actual policy work will be done in a future working group. I would also welcome the opportunity to address any questions about the motion or the history of the discussion group on this mailing list in advance of the meeting.
>
> Looking forward to seeing you all in Buenos Aires,
>
>      Bret Fausett
>
>
>
> = = = = = START = = = = =
>
> Motion to Request a Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLDs Subsequent 
> Rounds
>
> Whereas,
>
> 1. In 2005, this Council of the Generic Names Supporting Organization 
> (GNSO) began a policy development process to consider the introduction 
> of new gTLDs, which resulted in the creation of certain policy 
> recommendations for the launch of a new gTLD application process; and,
>
> 2. In September 2007, this Council adopted the policy recommendations 
> from the GNSO policy development process and forwarded them to the 
> ICANN Board of Directors; and,
>
> 3. The Final Report stated that " This policy development process has been designed to produce a systemised and ongoing mechanism for applicants to propose new top-level domains." 
>
> 4. In June 2008, the ICANN Board adopted the GNSO's policy 
> recommendations for the introduction of new gTLDs and directed staff 
> to develop an implementation plan for a new gTLD introduction process; 
> and
>
> 5. In June 2011, the ICANN Board approved an Application Guidebook 
> ("AGB") for new gTLDs and authorized the launch of the New gTLD 
> Program; and,
>
> 6. In June 2012, the first round application submission period closed; 
> and,
>
> 7. In June 2014, this Council created the New gTLD Subsequent 
> Procedures Discussion Group (DG) to discuss experiences gained and 
> lessons learned from the 2012 New gTLD round and identify subjects for 
> future issue reports, that may lead to changes or adjustments for 
> subsequent procedures; and,
>
> 8. In August 2014, the DG began deliberations, focusing primarily on 
> the identification of issues that members experienced in the 2012 New gTLD round; and, 9. In November 2014, the ICANN Board provided initial input on areas for possible policy work in Annex A related to a resolution on Planning for Future gTLD Application Rounds.
>
> 10. The DG developed a matrix which attempts to associate identified 
> issues with a corresponding principle, policy recommendation or 
> implementation guidance from the 2007 Final Report on New Generic 
> Top-Level Domains, or to note that the issue may warrant new policy 
> work. Furthermore, the DG developed a draft PDP WG charter that 
> identifies subjects, divided into provisional groupings, for further 
> analysis in a potential Issue Report and potential PDP; and,
>
> 11. The DG recommends that its set of deliverables serve as the basis for analysis in a single Issue Report.
>
> Now therefore, it is resolved:
>
> 1. The GNSO Council requests a single Issue Report that will analyze subjects that may lead to changes or adjustments for subsequent New gTLD Procedures. The Preliminary Issue Report should at a minimum consider:
>
> . The subjects that the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Discussion 
> Group identified in its deliverables (i.e., issues matrix and draft 
> charter); . Global Domains Division Staff input to the deliberations 
> of the DG, and; . The ICANN Board Resolution Annex A regarding Initial 
> Input on Areas for Possible Policy Work
>
> 2. In addition to covering the required elements of an Issue Report, ICANN Staff is also requested to provide options on how the subjects may be organized and worked through in a potential future PDP.
>
> = = = = = END = = = = =
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus