[council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT

Paul McGrady (Policy) policy at paulmcgrady.com
Thu Jan 21 18:47:03 UTC 2016


I do not support any rushed votes on today's call, with no notice to my C
that such a vote would be happening and no ability to get instructions, if
that is what is being proposed.  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
Behalf Of Johan Helsingius
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:08 PM
To: WUKnoben; council at gnso.icann.org
Cc: egmorris1 at toast.net
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT


Wolf-Ulrich,

> you're right, there is not overall support; but the reverse that the 
> GNSO overall doesn't support rec 11 is also not correct.

I agree - or, rather, to be really precise, we don't actually know how
strong or weak the support is. We know not everybody supports it, and we
know not everybody is against it. Therefore I support the suggestion Ed
proposed to have a vote to find out the exact degree of support.

	Julf







More information about the council mailing list