[council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT

Phil Corwin psc at vlaw-dc.com
Thu Jan 21 19:58:07 UTC 2016


Perhaps not a formal vote, but an informal straw poll, if necessary? 

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell

Twitter: @VlawDC
 
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul McGrady (Policy)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 1:47 PM
To: 'Johan Helsingius'; 'WUKnoben'; council at gnso.icann.org
Cc: egmorris1 at toast.net
Subject: RE: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT


I do not support any rushed votes on today's call, with no notice to my C that such a vote would be happening and no ability to get instructions, if that is what is being proposed.  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Johan Helsingius
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:08 PM
To: WUKnoben; council at gnso.icann.org
Cc: egmorris1 at toast.net
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT


Wolf-Ulrich,

> you're right, there is not overall support; but the reverse that the 
> GNSO overall doesn't support rec 11 is also not correct.

I agree - or, rather, to be really precise, we don't actually know how strong or weak the support is. We know not everybody supports it, and we know not everybody is against it. Therefore I support the suggestion Ed proposed to have a vote to find out the exact degree of support.

	Julf





-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4489/11316 - Release Date: 01/03/16 Internal Virus Database is out of date.




More information about the council mailing list