[council] Schedule/Timing of AoC Reviews

James M. Bladel jbladel at godaddy.com
Sat May 7 14:38:20 UTC 2016

Council Colleagues -

As discussed previously, I raised the topic of scheduled Reviews (as required under the Affirmation of Commitments) with the chairs of other SOs and ACs.  The discussion was sparse, but a few other groups shared the concern that two of these (ATRT3 and WHOIS2) could potentially collide with existing CCWGs and PDPs (specifically, RDS and implementation of Work Stream 1 of CCWG-ACCT).

However, there was no consensus as to what actions, if any, should be taken at this time.  In the absence of unified and formal guidance from the Community, the reviews will proceed as scheduled.  Any proposals to change the timing or scope would require engagement with the Board, and also likely NTIA.

If I recall, there will be a few opportunities to discuss this at the Policy Forum in Helsinki.  My recommendation is that we (GNSO, SGs, Cs, SO/ACs, etc.) continue to raise any remaining concerns in those sessions.

Thank you,

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160507/183a1eba/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list