[council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

[Darcy Southwell]

I support James’ suggestion on how to proceed.

 

Thanks,

Darcy

 

From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 9:58 PM
To: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>, Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>, "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

 

Thanks Donna.  

 

Figuring that many are out of the office this week, let’s give folks until Monday to weigh in or raise questions.

Thanks—

J.

 

From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 17:52 
To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>, Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>, GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

 

Hi James

 

Agree to proceed as you have suggested.

 

Thanks

 

Donna

 

 

 

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 7:28 PM
To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>; council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

 

Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.


Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and direction by the ICANN Board.

 

Question for the Council:  are there any questions or concerns on this topic, or is this relatively non-controversial?  If the latter, then I would ask that we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.  

 

Interested in hearing your thoughts.

 

Thanks—

 

J.

 

 

From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41 
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

 

All,

 

Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication.  You will recall from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further direction to ICANN staff.  This motion and the draft communication were prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our December 1 meeting.

 

Best,

Darcy

__________

Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer

M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20161123/4e769a19/attachment.html>