[council] Proposed motion for the selection of the Empowered Community representative

Johan Helsingius julf at julf.com
Tue Jun 27 17:15:28 UTC 2017


Wolf-Ulrich,

Good point - based on this, I suggest amending that sentence
in Resolved 1d to:

"Following this determination, this decision is to be confirmed by the
   GNSO Council _as part of the agenda_."

     Julf

On 23/06/17 10:06, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben wrote:
>
> Thanks Julf,
>
> but maybe I misunderstood. I mean the reference in the motion to the 
> consent agenda of the future meetings where the council is supposed to 
> sanction the leadership's proposal (see Resolved 1d: ...Following this 
> determination, this decision is to be confirmed by the GNSO Council 
> _as part of the consent agenda_...).
>
> What is the SSC's rationale for this?
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
> Am 20.06.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Johan Helsingius:
>> Wolf-Ulrich,
>>
>>> I've only one question: what is the SSC's rationale (under Res. 1d) to
>>> put this decision on the councils _consent_ agenda?
>> No rationale, purely an off-by-one error on my part.
>> It is supposed to be Item 4 on the agenda. My apologies!
>>
>> 	Julf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> council mailing list
>> council at gnso.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170627/1b14de52/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list