[council] Proposed motion for the selection of the Empowered Community representative
James M. Bladel
jbladel at godaddy.com
Fri Jun 23 08:55:43 UTC 2017
Will let Julf/Susan elaborate, but I'm presuming this means the selection would be a consent agenda item by default, but noting that -any- motion on the Consent Agenda item can be pulled out for a discussion/vote/deferral upon request of a Councilor.
Thanks -
J.
--------------
James Bladel
GoDaddy
On Jun 23, 2017, 10:07 +0200, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, wrote:
Thanks Julf,
but maybe I misunderstood. I mean the reference in the motion to the consent agenda of the future meetings where the council is supposed to sanction the leadership's proposal (see Resolved 1d: ...Following this determination, this decision is to be confirmed by the GNSO Council as part of the consent agenda...).
What is the SSC's rationale for this?
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
Am 20.06.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Johan Helsingius:
Wolf-Ulrich,
I've only one question: what is the SSC's rationale (under Res. 1d) to
put this decision on the councils _consent_ agenda?
No rationale, purely an off-by-one error on my part.
It is supposed to be Item 4 on the agenda. My apologies!
Julf
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170623/e1d83286/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list