[council] Path forward for CCWG-IG

[Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben]

Thanks Mary,

if I recall correctly there was a CCWG-IG meeting in Copenhagen where 
the charter has been discussed as well. Were there any amendments coming 
from this meeting?

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich


Am 03.05.2017 um 22:55 schrieb Mary Wong:
>
> Hello Wolf-Ulrich,
>
> Rafik may have more updated information but as far as GNSO staff knows 
> that is the last version of the Charter, and is what was submitted to 
> the Council right before the Copenhagen meeting.
>
> For your convenience, here is the direct link to the document 
> comparing the original and proposed revised Charter: 
> https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/comparison-table-ccwgig-charter-ccwgig-revised-charter-10mar17-en.pdf, 
> which is what was attached to the email of 10 March that James linked 
> to in his message.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mary
>
> *From: *<council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of 
> "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
> *Date: *Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 15:48
> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [council] Path forward for CCWG-IG
>
> Thanks James,
>
> just for better understanding: the link you're providing points to a 
> comparison table of the old end revised charter. Is this version of 
> the revised charter complete and the very recent update?
>
> Or can somebody just circulate the very last complete version?
>
> Thanks and regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
> Am 03.05.2017 um 00:11 schrieb James M. Bladel:
>
>     Colleagues –
>
>     At our meeting at ICANN57 (Hyderabad) the GNSO Council extended
>     its support as a Chartering Organization for this CCWG, but tasked
>     the leadership of this group to review its charter, and come to
>     ICANN58 (Copenhagen) with a report of its findings and,
>     potentially, a revised charter. 
>     (https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20161107-3)[gnso.icann.org]
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_resolutions-2320161107-2D3-2529&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=O2OpGolElm5pBJO6LY1LqPjY_SeEG-KVsD2uRnVXvOw&s=S_gUjeHZpNcFbSV6hZ34fYeb-t9TQCd1jLnQN4H9Nco&e=>
>     As a result, the CCWG presented an updated charter shortly before
>     our meeting in Copenhagen, but the Council did not have sufficient
>     time to consider it during our Public Meeting at ICANN58
>     (http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019816.html)
>     <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019816.html%29>
>     Finally, we briefly discussed this topic during our last meeting
>     on 20 APR, but no action was taken.
>     (https://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-20apr17-en.htm[gnso.icann.org]
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_meetings_agenda-2Dcouncil-2D20apr17-2Den.htm&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=O2OpGolElm5pBJO6LY1LqPjY_SeEG-KVsD2uRnVXvOw&s=nJg1qGkr36GIwPzhPwZOaTMLUM3AmWBKh_MZygMZh5E&e=>,
>     Item #8).
>
>     I propose that we target our next meeting (18 MAY) for a decision
>     on this revised charter, and the GNSO’s continued participation as
>     a Chartering Organization in the CCWG.
>
>     With this in mind, I ask all Councilors to discuss the revised
>     charter with their respective SG/C (and here on the Council list)
>     with the goal of submitting a relevant motion supporting or
>     withdrawing from this CCWG by our Motion & Document deadline
>     (currently 8 MAY).
>
>     Thank you,
>
>     J.
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     council mailing list
>
>     council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> [avast.com] 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_sig-2Demail-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dlink-26utm-5Fcampaign-3Dsig-2Demail-26utm-5Fcontent-3Demailclient&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=O2OpGolElm5pBJO6LY1LqPjY_SeEG-KVsD2uRnVXvOw&s=7Kk_pIre5AgIEIOU3jYwcdpogQ3KXh4Ssnw0VD_PQDQ&e=>
>
> 	
>
> Virenfrei. www.avast.com[avast.com] 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_sig-2Demail-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dlink-26utm-5Fcampaign-3Dsig-2Demail-26utm-5Fcontent-3Demailclient&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=O2OpGolElm5pBJO6LY1LqPjY_SeEG-KVsD2uRnVXvOw&s=7Kk_pIre5AgIEIOU3jYwcdpogQ3KXh4Ssnw0VD_PQDQ&e=> 
>
>



---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170504/ac321a53/attachment.html>