[council] Path forward for CCWG-IG
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben
wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Thu May 4 12:01:44 UTC 2017
Thanks Rafik!
Wolf-Ulrich
Am 04.05.2017 um 13:49 schrieb Rafik Dammak:
> Hi,
>
> The latest version is the one sent prior to Copenhagen meeting, no
> amendment was made since.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> On May 4, 2017 8:09 PM, "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben"
> <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Mary,
>
> if I recall correctly there was a CCWG-IG meeting in Copenhagen
> where the charter has been discussed as well. Were there any
> amendments coming from this meeting?
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
> Am 03.05.2017 um 22:55 schrieb Mary Wong:
>>
>> Hello Wolf-Ulrich,
>>
>> Rafik may have more updated information but as far as GNSO staff
>> knows that is the last version of the Charter, and is what was
>> submitted to the Council right before the Copenhagen meeting.
>>
>> For your convenience, here is the direct link to the document
>> comparing the original and proposed revised Charter:
>> https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/comparison-table-ccwgig-charter-ccwgig-revised-charter-10mar17-en.pdf
>> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/comparison-table-ccwgig-charter-ccwgig-revised-charter-10mar17-en.pdf>,
>> which is what was attached to the email of 10 March that James
>> linked to in his message.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Mary
>>
>> *From: *<council-bounces at gnso.icann.org>
>> <mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of
>> "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 15:48
>> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org" <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>> <council at gnso.icann.org> <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [council] Path forward for CCWG-IG
>>
>> Thanks James,
>>
>> just for better understanding: the link you're providing points
>> to a comparison table of the old end revised charter. Is this
>> version of the revised charter complete and the very recent update?
>>
>> Or can somebody just circulate the very last complete version?
>>
>> Thanks and regards
>>
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>> Am 03.05.2017 um 00:11 schrieb James M. Bladel:
>>
>> Colleagues –
>>
>> At our meeting at ICANN57 (Hyderabad) the GNSO Council
>> extended its support as a Chartering Organization for this
>> CCWG, but tasked the leadership of this group to review its
>> charter, and come to ICANN58 (Copenhagen) with a report of
>> its findings and, potentially, a revised charter.
>> (https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20161107-3)[gnso.icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_resolutions-2320161107-2D3-2529&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=O2OpGolElm5pBJO6LY1LqPjY_SeEG-KVsD2uRnVXvOw&s=S_gUjeHZpNcFbSV6hZ34fYeb-t9TQCd1jLnQN4H9Nco&e=>
>> As a result, the CCWG presented an updated charter shortly
>> before our meeting in Copenhagen, but the Council did not
>> have sufficient time to consider it during our Public Meeting
>> at ICANN58
>> (http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019816.html)
>> <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019816.html%29>
>> Finally, we briefly discussed this topic during our last
>> meeting on 20 APR, but no action was taken.
>> (https://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-20apr17-en.htm[gnso.icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_meetings_agenda-2Dcouncil-2D20apr17-2Den.htm&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=O2OpGolElm5pBJO6LY1LqPjY_SeEG-KVsD2uRnVXvOw&s=nJg1qGkr36GIwPzhPwZOaTMLUM3AmWBKh_MZygMZh5E&e=>,
>> Item #8).
>>
>> I propose that we target our next meeting (18 MAY) for a
>> decision on this revised charter, and the GNSO’s continued
>> participation as a Chartering Organization in the CCWG.
>>
>> With this in mind, I ask all Councilors to discuss the
>> revised charter with their respective SG/C (and here on the
>> Council list) with the goal of submitting a relevant motion
>> supporting or withdrawing from this CCWG by our Motion &
>> Document deadline (currently 8 MAY).
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> council mailing list
>>
>> council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
>>
>> [avast.com]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_sig-2Demail-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dlink-26utm-5Fcampaign-3Dsig-2Demail-26utm-5Fcontent-3Demailclient&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=O2OpGolElm5pBJO6LY1LqPjY_SeEG-KVsD2uRnVXvOw&s=7Kk_pIre5AgIEIOU3jYwcdpogQ3KXh4Ssnw0VD_PQDQ&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>> Virenfrei. www.avast.com[avast.com]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_sig-2Demail-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dlink-26utm-5Fcampaign-3Dsig-2Demail-26utm-5Fcontent-3Demailclient&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=O2OpGolElm5pBJO6LY1LqPjY_SeEG-KVsD2uRnVXvOw&s=7Kk_pIre5AgIEIOU3jYwcdpogQ3KXh4Ssnw0VD_PQDQ&e=>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
>
>
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170504/61f27967/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list