[council] GNSO Council response to GAC communique

[Heather Forrest]

Thanks, Susan - I'm including GNSO Secretariat so they have the language
immediately to hand.

Staff- would it be possible to include this in brackets in the document
before it's posted?

Many thanks to all,

Heather

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Susan Kawaguchi <susankpolicy at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Heather,
>
> After discussions in the BC we would like to add the following language to
> the response to the GAC advice.
>
> "The GNSO Council agrees with the GAC that the continued and lawful
> availability of WHOIS/RDS data for consumer protection, intellectual
> property rights protection and law enforcement activities is a vital public
> concern and that ICANN should strive to explore all possible mechanisms
> under the GDPR to ensure that this data remains available for legitimate
> activities that protect the public and promote a safe, secure, and
> trustworthy online environment.  Especially, when the WHOIS/RDS data is
> associated with a domain name used for commercial activity."
>
> Best regards,
>
> Susan
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Donna, all,
>>
>> I have reviewed the document for a final sanity check and made some very
>> minor typographical edits for consistency in the attached. The only
>> substantive edits are that we hadn't filled out columns 3 and 4 (does the
>> advice concern GNSO remit and is it subject to existing work or
>> recommendations) for a few items. I have inserted text here but would
>> appreciate the drafting team casting eyes over, as it may well be that
>> there was a reason for not responding to these, and I missed that.
>>
>> Finally, *a plea that everyone socialise this Response this week **within
>> SGs and Cs *and raise any concerns or proposed edits *prior to
>> Thursday's Council meeting.* Our response is only effective if it
>> reaches the Board in a timely manner as the Board considers the relevant
>> GAC advice. For this to occur, we need a Response that we can agree on and
>> approve in Thursday's meeting. If any SG/C has concerns, I ask that you
>> please raise these on the list as soon as possible.
>>
>> Many thanks to the drafting team and to Donna for shepherding this effort
>> from Council leadership. It's brilliant to have such efficient production
>> of the response, even with the interruption of North American Thanksgiving
>> holidays.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Heather
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Austin, Donna via council <
>> council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Fellow Councilors
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please find attached the GNSO Council’s proposed response to the GAC
>>> communique from Abu Dhabi, along with a motion to approve the response at
>>> our upcoming meeting on 30 November 2017.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Donna
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Donna Austin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> council mailing list
>>> council at gnso.icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> council mailing list
>> council at gnso.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20171201/dbd00e2b/attachment.html>