[council] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique

[philippe.fouquart at orange.com]

Rafik, Donna and all, thanks for this, it’s fine with me.

I guess it’s “encourage the GAC to strengthen…” at the end of the first paragraph (no s, [we] encourage).

Regards,

Philippe Fouquart


From: council [mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:39 AM
To: Austin, Donna
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] [EXTERNAL] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique

Thanks, Donna for those changes, I am attached the new version of the GNSO response which includes them.

Best,

Rafik
2018-04-11 10:18 GMT+09:00 Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at team.neustar<mailto:Donna.Austin at team.neustar>>:
Rafik, all

I’m really sorry for these late additions, but I think we could be clearer in our message on Other Issues and as such suggest the following replace what we currently have:

Identifying whether an issue has public policy implications is not the role of the PDP WG. This is generally because its members are not assumed to have this particular expertise. The introduction of the quick look mechanism, a recommendation of the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group, is an important mechanism that provides the GAC an opportunity to identify public policy issues early in the PDP lifecycle.  We acknowledge that the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group also encouraged PDP Working Groups to communicate to the GAC about how its input has been considered and addressed; and also encourages the GAC to strengthen its participation in the latter stages of the PDP.

The Council acknowledges the challenges associated with GAC members being able to participate in PDP efforts and in that regard, we greatly appreciate the manner in which GAC members are participating in WT5 of the Subsequent Procedures PDP WG, particularly with regard to identifying public policy issues.

Thanks

Donna

From: council [mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org>] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 4:50 PM
To: Council GNSO <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [council] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique

Hi all,

we have to send our response asap, the GAC-Board call is scheduled for Wednesday and so we got a short time window to finalize it.
please raise any concerns you want to flag asap attaching the doc again for your review.

Best,

Rafik

2018-04-09 19:55 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
Hi all,

please find attached for your review and feedback the draft version of GNSO Review of GAC Communique. from the small team of volunteers.

Best,

Rafik






_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180411/48e6b4e5/attachment-0001.html>