[council] FW: Motion and charter - Adoption of the charter for the ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Implementation Advisory Group (WHOIS Procedure IAG)

Wed Jan 24 23:35:52 UTC 2018

Thanks, Heather.

I have some concerns that the language from Decision-Making Methodologies (i.e., “The Chair may make a call for Consensus. If making such a call, the Chair should always make reasonable efforts to involve all Stakeholder Group appointed Members of the IAG.”) may conflict somewhat with the language in Membership Criteria (i.e., “However, should there be a need for a consensus call or decision, such consensus call or decision will be limited to members appointed by the GNSO SGs, who may consult as appropriate with their respective SGs.”). 

Is the “reasonable efforts” language for the Chair to achieve consensus typical give the membership criteria language?  Or has it worked in practice in prior IAGs?

Thanks,

Darcy

From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:31 PM
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
Cc: gnso-SECS <gnso-secs at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] FW: Motion and charter - Adoption of the charter for the ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Implementation Advisory Group (WHOIS Procedure IAG)

Dear colleagues,

The version of the draft charter circulated for document deadline contained an unresolved question that had been raised by Pam Little (RrSG). Following discussions with Pam, I would like to propose the attached revisions, which I understand to be semantic in nature and not affecting the substance (ie, edits to clarify the intention rather than change the scope of the group's efforts or outcomes), as friendly amendments for the Council's consideration.

Many thanks to Pam for her willingness to discuss and reach a way forward with plenty of time for us all to consider these before next Tuesday.

I note that one decision remains, which is the question of whether policy or GDD staff should support the effort. I encourage those with experience of the previous IAG to weigh in. 

Best wishes,

Heather

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at team.neustar> wrote:

All

The deadline for submitting motions for the Council meeting on 30 January 2018, is today 20 January 2018 at 23:59 UTC.

Rafik and I were reminded that the deadline was looming about two hours ago by Marika. In accordance with Heather’s email of 18 January 2018, to this list, we agreed that in the absence of being able to find anyone on this distribution list to submit the motion and charter to meet the motion deadline, I would do it.

To that end it is important that you all review the Charter as submitted to be sure that the version is correct. In the interests of time, Pam’s edits were accepted, but her question regarding impact analysis was not addressed. I’m sure we can swap it out if necessary, citing administrative error.

Donna 

From: council [mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Austin, Donna via council
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 3:49 PM
To: council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [council] Motion and charter - Adoption of the charter for the ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Implementation Advisory Group (WHOIS Procedure IAG)

All

Please find attached the motion for the “Adoption of the charter for the ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Implementation Advisory Group (WHOIS Procedure IAG)” along with the proposed Charter for consideration during our next Council call on 30 January 2018.

Thanks

Donna

_______________________________________________ council mailing list council at gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180124/d45a5e6a/attachment.html>