[council] GNSO Review of the Panama GAC Communique

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Wed Jul 18 13:23:29 UTC 2018

Hi Julf.

Yes we don't have motion and so we will go with non-objection approach by



On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 10:18 PM Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:

> Hi, Rafik,
> My apologies for being unclear.
> > I am not sure to understand the point you are making here. I was not
> > commenting if the response to gac communique is in agenda or not.
> > Of course, it can be added under AOB.
> I guess my point is that as it is under AOB, I don't think we can
> formally approve the draft anyway on Thursday.
> > My understanding is that the board-gac call is scheduled for the 27th
> > July. I was only suggesting that IGO-INGO curative part should be
> > amended because council already received the report (the current
> > response only mention that council will receive it in July) and we may
> > need more info in the new version to the letter since IGO-INGO topic is
> > an agenda item for tomorrow call.
> Indeed. So I guess we have to approve the final version by email after
> Thursday?
>         Julf
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180718/800ee35d/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list