[council] ICANN Org Proposed Unified Access Model

[Rubens Kuhl]

And it seems SSAC also wants to steer aspects of this that I would classify as GNSO policy.

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-101-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-101-en.pdf>

Some of the recommendations sound like PDP scoping, others outside the picket fence, other trying to move policy to contract amendments...


Rubens



> Em 19 de jun de 2018, à(s) 08:23:000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com> escreveu:
> 
> Ayden
> 
> I think that’s a very valid question
> 
> I was working on the assumption that as Council we would be managing the policy development process that the temporary specification spawned. Now it appears that ICANN senior management have started cleaving off sections and putting it somewhere else, though I’m still at a loss to really understand where exactly that “somewhere else” lives.
> 
> While some parts of the temporary specification are outside the scope of policy, this access model is a fundamental policy issue in my mind.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Michele
> 
> 
> --
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
> https://www.blacknight.com/ <https://www.blacknight.com/>
> http://blacknight.blog/ <http://blacknight.blog/>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ <https://michele.blog/>
> Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ <https://ceo.hosting/>
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
> 
> From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> Reply-To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> Date: Tuesday 19 June 2018 at 09:18
> To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [council] ICANN Org Proposed Unified Access Model
> 
> Could this, in any way, have implications for the EPDP?
> 
> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-update-seeking-community-feedback-on-proposed-unified-access-model <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-update-seeking-community-feedback-on-proposed-unified-access-model>
> 
> There is no deadline for the submission of feedback, and it does not appear on the public comment page, so I presume it is an informal request for community input.
> 
> Best wishes, Ayden
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180619/39b4e46a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 528 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180619/39b4e46a/signature.asc>