[council] [EXTERNAL] Fwd: [soac-chairs] ccNSO Council resolves not to participate in RDS/WHOIS2

[Susan Kawaguchi]

Hi Donna,

The ccnso waited to see the scope for the RT before making a final decision
not to provide volunteers and then informed the RT.  I am concerned about
the process for providing candidates to review teams in general.    The RDS
RT only has members from the GNSO, GAC and AlAC that leaves 4 SG/ACs that
are not participating.  The GNSO was able to secure 4 seats due to the
subject matter.

At this point, it would be difficult to add more team members to the RDS RT
but in general 15 members would be optimal in starting an RT.  Obviously,
the SG's/AC's have to make their own decision on participation but if an RT
had at least one member from each it would be more representative of the
community which in my opinion is more representational.  If we can find a
way as a community to address participation by all SG/AC's or that they
relinquish some of their seats when the decision on RT members are made
then it would be a stronger review.


The GDPR is definitely a large distraction but since the RDS RT is taking a
look back on what has happened since the last review I think we are doing
ok. Not an optimal situation but as most work done in our multistakeholder
system we will make it work.

Susan






On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
wrote:

> Heather, Susan
>
>
>
> Where does this leave the RDS Review Team in terms of adequate membership?
> I know Susan has raised concerns previously that there isn’t enough people
> to do the work.
>
>
>
> Is it possible for the GNSO to recommend additional candidates to fill the
> vacancies left by the ccNSO’s decision not to appoint volunteers?
>
>
>
> Donna
>
>
>
> *From:* council [mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Heather
> Forrest
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2018 10:51 AM
> *To:* GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [council] Fwd: [soac-chairs] ccNSO Council resolves
> not to participate in RDS/WHOIS2
>
>
>
> Dear Council colleagues,
>
>
>
> Please note the ccNSO's affirmed position on RDS/WHOIS2 RT.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
> Heather
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Katrina Sataki* <katrina at nic.lv>
> Date: Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM
> Subject: [soac-chairs] ccNSO Council resolves not to participate in
> RDS/WHOIS2
> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> Cc: Goran Marby <goran.marby at icann.org>, Chris Disspain <
> chris.disspain at board.icann.org>, mike.silber at board.icann.org, SOAC Chairs
> <soac-chairs at icann.org>
>
> 7 March 2018
>
>
>
> To: Alan Greenberg, RDS/WHOIS 2 Review Team, Chair
>
> CC: Chris Disspain, Mike Silber, Göran Marby, Chairs of ALAC, ASO, GAC,
> GNSO, SSAC, RSAC
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Alan,
>
>
>
> In May 2017, we informed the ICANN Board of Directors that the ccNSO did
> not find itself in a position to nominate candidates for the RDS/ WHOIS2
> Review Team, and deferred participation in this specific review.
>
>
>
> On 18 January 2018, the ccNSO Council again discussed its participation in
> the review. Following this discussion, by 16 February 2018, the ccNSO
> Council decided not to participate in the RDS/WHOIS2 specific review.
>
>
>
> The ccNSO Council thanks the volunteers who sought endorsement of the
> ccNSO.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Katrina Sataki,
>
> Chair of the ccNSO
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> soac-chairs mailing list
> soac-chairs at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-chairs
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_soac-2Dchairs&d=DwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=z_9KlnGUQfzfjAPK60pwOGQ2z1_9dnUTx9nfWFZ0teA&s=bckZA-Th5eFVMWmo4Yk61megNGgOUiJTbBHZaB-WcDg&e=>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180321/731030d0/attachment.html>