[council] EPDP & Accreditation/Access Model

[Darcy Southwell]

Rafik, as Council liaison to the EPDP, what can you share about the impact
the EPDP Team sees here?

 

Darcy

 

From: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 8:11 AM
To: council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: EPDP & Accreditation/Access Model

 

The BC/IPC recently sent a letter to ICANN org
(https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/bc-ipc-to-marby-07sep1
8-en.pdf) about the accreditation and access model.  This letter seems
problematic at this stage of the game.  We discussed this issue ad nauseam
during the EPDP Charter development and the Council has tasked the EPDP with
addressing the Annex. To ask ICANN org to circumvent the EPDP undermines the
policy development process and seems disingenuous to the Council's approval
of the Charter.  In addition, the EDPB's July 5 letter states responsibility
for designing an access model lies with ICANN and the registries/registrars,
not just ICANN as indicated in the BC/IPC letter.

 

Will our BC and/or IPC councilors please shed some light on this?

 

Thanks,

Darcy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180919/a8600e17/attachment.html>