[council] EPDP list of Observers is incomplete

Erika Mann erika at erikamann.com
Fri Apr 5 06:17:53 UTC 2019


I do agree with Rubens. He’s making a good suggestion. 
Erika 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 4, 2019, at 10:59 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Em 4 de abr de 2019, à(s) 15:48:000, Drazek, Keith via council <council at gnso.icann.org> escreveu:
>> 
>> All,
>>  
>> My quick and preliminary reaction here is:
>>  
>> We should decide whether we believe observer lists are needed, or not. I don’t have a strong opinion here. Noting that anyone can technically ‘observe’ PDP WG email discussions via the public email archives, perhaps maintaining a list of subscribed observers is mostly meaningless and really just an extra burden on staff to maintain.
> 
> 
> Agreed. 
> 
>> However, IF we decide we want a list of subscribed observers, I agree with Ayden it should be complete, up-to-date and accurate, to include all observes whether they are staff or otherwise. Otherwise, what’s the point? Naturally recognizing that all GNSO Policy staff subscribe to all PDP mailing lists, we could identify them by group rather than name.
> 
> One possibility is not keep a list of who receives the mailing list, which is meaningless for publicly-archived lists, but for those that want to declare themselves observers. It would be unrelated to whether that person gets list mail or not, but a self declaration that he or she is observing. Totally opt-in, revokable at any time. 
> 
> 
> 
> Rubens
> 
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190405/d3a7e3eb/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list