[council] ICANN's Legislative/Regulatory Tracker -- Recommended Improvements
Erika Mann
erika at erikamann.com
Wed Apr 10 10:01:15 UTC 2019
Keith, All -
I believe the current format and information gathering practice (
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/legislative-regulatory-30jan19-en.pdf)
is
not sufficient and would therefore recommend few things:
- ICANN ORG should work with a professional firm in receiving regular
updates (monitoring report) about regulatory issues that cause concern
- To make such a Monitoring Report (MR) not too expensive
- ICANN should focus on few regions, regions that cause the
majority of concerns
- Monitoring reports should be received 4 times/year
- Early warning notes should be received as quickly as possible
- The current Crowed Sourced Tracking Report should remain as an
additional information source
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/legislative-regulatory-30jan19-en.pdf
- I agree with Paul that it is key "CANN’s government relations folks to
visit us at Council and highlight the main issues it sees heading our way"
- I agree with Flip, the list of topics that should be monitored need to
be broadened
- I agree with Ayden to some degree but recommend to focus on few aspect
"ICANN should monitor 1) the impact the law/regulation/directive has had as
it relates to ICANN's remit" and, once a legislation is introduced, ICANN
must do a compliance assessment. I don't believe that lobbying strategies
should be broadly discussed in the community.
- I agree with Martin, the Crowed Sourced Tracking Report should
cooperate with existing Regional Intelligence Tracking Reports.
Kind regards,
Erika
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:35 PM Drazek, Keith via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:
> Ayden, Darcy, Erika, Flip, Michele, Phillipe and Tatiana:
>
>
>
> During our GNSO Working Session in Kobe, the seven of you volunteered to
> help develop GNSO Council recommendations for improvements to ICANN’s
> current Legislative/Regulatory tracking effort.
>
>
>
> As we discussed, ICANN’s work in this area is relatively new and still
> evolving, and we have an opportunity to engage with Theresa’s group to help
> shape their approach to ensure it is applicable to our policy work and
> process management responsibilities. While their work product is currently
> a spreadsheet, I recall we agreed it needs to go much deeper in analysis
> and demonstrate a predictive capability for where future or existing
> regulations impact GNSO policies, in effect now or under future development.
>
>
>
> Please work together and with Staff to help kick off this important and
> timely work.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190410/538e0ee7/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list