[council] ICANN's Legislative/Regulatory Tracker -- Recommended Improvements

Erika Mann erika at erikamann.com
Wed Apr 10 10:01:15 UTC 2019


Keith, All -

I believe the current format and information gathering practice (
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/legislative-regulatory-30jan19-en.pdf)
 is
not sufficient and would therefore recommend few things:

   - ICANN ORG should work with a professional firm in receiving regular
   updates (monitoring report) about regulatory issues that cause concern
      - To make such a Monitoring Report (MR) not too expensive
         - ICANN should focus on few regions, regions that cause the
         majority of concerns
         - Monitoring reports should be received 4 times/year
         - Early warning notes should be received as quickly as possible
      - The current Crowed Sourced Tracking Report should remain as an
   additional information source
   https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/legislative-regulatory-30jan19-en.pdf
   - I agree with Paul that it is key "CANN’s government relations folks to
   visit us at Council and highlight the main issues it sees heading our way"
   - I agree with Flip, the list of topics that should be monitored need to
   be broadened
   - I agree with Ayden to some degree but recommend to focus on few aspect
   "ICANN should monitor 1) the impact the law/regulation/directive has had as
   it relates to ICANN's remit" and, once a legislation is introduced, ICANN
   must do a compliance assessment. I don't believe that lobbying strategies
   should be broadly discussed in the community.
   - I agree with Martin, the Crowed Sourced Tracking Report should
   cooperate with existing Regional Intelligence Tracking Reports.

Kind regards,
Erika


On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:35 PM Drazek, Keith via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:

> Ayden, Darcy, Erika, Flip, Michele, Phillipe and Tatiana:
>
>
>
> During our GNSO Working Session in Kobe, the seven of you volunteered to
> help develop GNSO Council recommendations for improvements to ICANN’s
> current Legislative/Regulatory tracking effort.
>
>
>
> As we discussed, ICANN’s work in this area is relatively new and still
> evolving, and we have an opportunity to engage with Theresa’s group to help
> shape their approach to ensure it is applicable to our policy work and
> process management responsibilities. While their work product is currently
> a spreadsheet, I recall we agreed it needs to go much deeper in analysis
> and demonstrate a predictive capability for where future or existing
> regulations impact GNSO policies, in effect now or under future development.
>
>
>
> Please work together and with Staff to help kick off this important and
> timely work.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190410/538e0ee7/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list