[council] Update from EPDP team & Questions

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Maxim,

My understanding is that the reference to OCTO is just a convenient
shorthand but the EPDP team is aware that this would be an ICANN purpose
and not just a department purpose only.
I am putting here as reference the the full text of the recommendation :
"The EPDP Team commits to considering in Phase 2 of its work whether
additional purposes should be considered to facilitate ICANN’s Office of
the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) to carry out its mission (see
https://www.icann.org/octo). This consideration should be informed by legal
guidance on if/how provisions in the GDPR concerning research apply to
ICANN Org and the expression for the need of such pseudonymized data by
ICANN."

I think there are more explanation about the background in the final report
(
https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/epdp-gtld-registration-data-specs-final-20feb19-en.pdf)
at page 36.

Best,

Rafik

Le ven. 24 mai 2019 à 19:09, Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hello Rafik,
>
> I have a question on the item of 'Additional purpose for ICANN’s OCTO'
>
> The question is:
> How ICANN’s OCTO can have any purpose, different from the purposes of
> ICANN at all ?
>
> It does not exist from the legal perspective for outsiders
> (nobody cares about the department structure outside of the same
> organisation).
>
> BTW - if it has any purpose different from ICANN's - it might be a sign of
> mutiny. (disclaimer, 7-8 words to the left not to be taken seriously).
>
> Sincerely Yours,
>
> Maxim Alzoba
> Special projects manager,
> International Relations Department,
> FAITID
>
>
> Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow)
>
>
> > On 24 May 2019, at 04:18, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > Here some brief update from the EPDP team. The team spent the last calls
> (90min call per week) since Janis started his role as chair early this
> month to discuss the approach to be followed for phase 2,  including also
> the review the legal questions and the tools the team will use for
> deliberation. I attached the slides presented in last call to explain the
> approach ,includes a rough high level timeline and next steps till
> Marrakech meeting. Please let me know if you want more details.
> >
> > I also got request for clarification in the last call. As expected,
> there was interest within EPDP team with regard to board resolution on EPDP
> phase final report and policy recommendations. The EPDP team is seeking
> clarification from the GNSO Council regarding the Bylaw-triggered
> consultation process following the non-adoption by Board of parts of GNSO
> Council approved recommendations. I understand that council can
> realistically respond to this after our extraordinary meeting on board
> resolution next week.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Rafik
> > _______________________________________________
> > council mailing list
> > council at gnso.icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190525/c13176a3/attachment.html>