[council] For your review: Council SSAD Small Team draft letter

Tue Mar 30 22:24:05 UTC 2021

Dear Philippe:
Many thanks to Pam for producing the referral document.

Having reviewed Pam's comparative side-by-side analysis, I tend to agree
that the letter might be redundant. As Pam suggested, it could still be a
collector for Council's talking points and so useful downstream.

Hold and repurpose.

Best,
Carlton

==============================
*Carlton A Samuels*

*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:17 AM philippe.fouquart--- via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> As you would recall, at our last Council call we agreed to try and develop
> a response letter to the board on the SSAD prior to our call on April 1st.
>
>
>
>
> In light of the discussion on this letter and the board’s vote, sending
> the letter at this point would appear redundant in light of the overlap
> with the ODP scoping document, and difficult to agree on anyway given the
> timeline.
>
>
>
> We discussed this within the leadership and we suggest to approach our
> meeting with the questions drew out of the letter which Pam provided a
> first draft of. The goal would essentially be the same as the letter
> without losing the work that was put into it ie
>
> a) confirm our understanding (now consolidated with the ODP scoping
> document) and
>
> b) raise questions that wouldn’t seem to be addressed (seem to be missing
> in the scoping document).
>
>
>
> It is a bit less formal than the intended letter but would avoid appearing
> lagging being. Please have a look at the document that Pam circulated and
> review.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
> *From:* council [mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Pam
> Little via council
> *Sent:* Friday, March 26, 2021 6:59 AM
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org; Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org
> >
> *Subject:* Re: [council] For your review: Council SSAD Small Team draft
> letter
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> Further to Caitlin's email below, I have developed the attached document
> to try to see how the ODP scope correlates to the exchange between the
> Council and the Board to date and the draft letter to the Board that is
> still in progress.
>
>
>
> As you will see from these tables, most of the questions raised or to be
> raised by the Council seem somehow covered in the ODP scope but notably the
> Council-requested cost-benefit analysis is missing. So it seems to me we
> should reconsider whether the letter is still needed or whether we should
> just focus on talking points for our upcoming meeting with the Board.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Pam
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sender:council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
> Sent At:2021 Mar. 26 (Fri.) 09:44
>
> Recipient:council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
> Subject:Re: [council] For your review: Council SSAD Small Team draft letter
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> Thank you to those who have added comments to the draft SSAD letter to
> the Board
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YjR-YsjqRSTnU0a_bbG3zXUwpeJ7g6cO1kIRudrYDqQ/edit?ts=60524b5e>.
>
>
>
>
> During today’s Public Board Meeting, the Board passed a motion directing
> ICANN org to initiate the ODP for the SSAD and provided additional
> information on the SSAD ODP and what it will entail. Please find a link to
> the session, which will include the recording as soon as available:
> https://70.schedule.icann.org/meetings/stTLvWoo7CtGti8du#/?limit=10&sortByFields[0]=isPinned&sortByFields[1]=lastActivityAt&sortByOrders[0]=-1&sortByOrders[1]=-1&
> uid=E6umHFHPvcfTAnSNE.
>
>
>
> If you were unable to attend the session, it may be worth reviewing the
> recording to determine if the letter/talking points require any editing in
> light of the Board’s comments.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Caitlin
>
>
>
> *From: *Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 6:20 PM
> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *For your review: Council SSAD Small Team draft letter
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> Further to the discussion from today’s meeting, please provide feedback to
> the draft SSAD letter to the Board by *COB Friday, 26 March*:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YjR-YsjqRSTnU0a_bbG3zXUwpeJ7g6cO1kIRudrYDqQ/edit?ts=60524b5e
> .
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Caitlin
>
>
>
> *From: *Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 3:36 PM
> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *Council SSAD Small Team draft letter
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors:
>
>
>
> Following the Council's recent engagement with the Board regarding the
> SSAD consultation, the SSAD Small Team worked together to draft a letter
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YjR-YsjqRSTnU0a_bbG3zXUwpeJ7g6cO1kIRudrYDqQ/edit?ts=60524b5e>,
> confirming the outcomes of the meeting and posing additional questions for
> the Board's consideration. The letter still has several comments and
> proposed edits, which have been left in for the sake of transparency (since
> all commenters may not have had an opportunity to review the most recent
> edits). For ease of readability, you may wish to review the draft in
> "viewing" mode to avoid the array of colors. This letter is on the agenda
> for tomorrow's meeting, and Council leadership will go over it in greater
> detail tomorrow.
>
>
>
> We request that you do not make any additional changes to the Google Doc
> at this time; instead, please express concerns or provide additional
> comments via the mailing list.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Caitlin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210330/2f3d7a4a/attachment-0001.html>