[council] FW: SSAD-Light is a step in the wrong direction

[philippe.fouquart at orange.com]

Dear Coucilors,

As noted in the chat of our call earlier to day and for transparency for those (presumably few) who wouldn't have been in the list, please note Steves's comment.

Regards,

Philippe




-------- Message d'origine --------
De : Steve Crocker <steve at shinkuro.com>
Date : 13/04/2022 23:53 (GMT+01:00)
À : Kurt Pritz <kurt at kjpritz.com>, Sebastien at registry.godaddy, Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba at gmail.com>, "DiBiase, Gregory" <dibiase at amazon.com>, theo geurts <gtheo at xs4all.nl>, marie.pattullo at aim.be, john.mcelwaine at nelsonmullins.com, fpetillion at petillion.law, FOUQUART Philippe INNOV/NET <philippe.fouquart at orange.com>, "Thomas Rickert | rickert.law" <thomas at rickert.law>, wisdom.dk at gmail.com, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, 陳曼茹 Manju Chen <manju at nii.org.tw>, jumaropi at yahoo.com, farell at benin2point0.org, mesumbeslin at gmail.com, Desiree <desiree at relax.co.uk>, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli at gmail.com>, "McGrady, Jr., Paul D." <pmcgrady at taftlaw.com>, jeff at jjnsolutions.com, justine.chew.icann at gmail.com, Maarten Simon <maarten.simon at sidn.nl>
Cc : Steve Crocker <steve at shinkuro.com>
Objet : SSAD-Light is a step in the wrong direction

[Email addresses for Antonia Chu and Mark Datysgeld weren't available.  Please forward to them.]

Councillors,

Tomorrow you will consider the "SSAD-Light" proposal from the Small Team.  I think we all share great frustration in achieving a consensus toward developing an effective system for access to registration data directory services.  Unfortunately, this proposal is not only a not solution, it is not a helpful step in the right direction.

I recognize how awkward and uncomfortable it is to be told the plan won't work without also having a viable alternative.  Nonetheless, that's the current state of affairs.  The flaws in both the SSAD and the SSAD Light have been stated repeatedly.  The stated goals of both systems are not aligned with the proposed designs.

ICANN's multistakeholder process embodies the positive quality of attempting to include all the relevant stakeholders.  That's admirable but not sufficient.  It does not protect us from agreeing on nonsense.

The best and only proper action for you to take is to send it back to both the small team and Org with instructions to try harder.

Steve Crocker
SSAC member
Former ICANN board chair
Member of the GNSO Phase 2A, Accuracy Scoping Team, SSAD ODA, and SSAD Small Teams



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20220414/4849dd2c/attachment-0001.html>