[CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] Subsequent Procedures

[Maureen Hilyard]

I like the idea of grouping the issues under topics as well. . it would
make it a little more manageable and people might want to focus on
particular topics.

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
wrote:

> Dear Holly,
>
> I agree with the focus that you are proposing. I have looked at the
> working Google DOC on https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/
> 1agNhbXfXLPQIRTGjC-8U-l534SWpbnsiapi-fi5mzFw/edit?usp=sharing which
> contains all of the questions that are being asked, and there are plenty of
> them, perhaps part of the reason why nobody appears to have focussed on
> commenting on the page yet.
>
> But focussing on the area which you are proposing could allow us to share
> our comments on what matters for At-Large.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> On 08/08/2018 07:09, Holly Raiche wrote:
>
> Folks
>
> Having gone through the Report and Appendix C, the issues that ALAC has
> been concerned with before and - I am suggesting - should concentrate on in
> its response include:
>
> *Community Priority Evaluations*
> These applicants had priority, but the definition was narrow and few
> applications made it through on this. The definition needs to be revisited,
> and the evaluation more transparent and predictable- and finalised BEFORE
> evaluation
>
> *Metrics*
> Unde the general heading, the question is asked whether there should be
> success metrics.  We said - and I believe should continue to say - have
> metrics as to what success looks like from an ALAC perspective.
>
> *PICS*
> Under global public interest, the question is asked whether there should
> continue to be PICS.  They are there because we argued for them - and still
> should
>
> *Applications from outside the US/Europe*
> We expressed concern that most of the applications came from the US and,
> to a lesser extent, Europe.  We said this came down to a number of factors,
> including
>
>    - Length and complexity of Applicant Guidebook - it should be more
>    accessible, comprehensible, in different languages
>    - Need for applicant support - maybe a dedicated round for developing
>    countries
>    - Possibility of variable fees
>
> *IDNs*
> The report mentions need for further work to be done on Universal
> Acceptance
>
>
> Happy to discuss
>
> Holly
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing listCPWG at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing listregistration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20180808/3a24281b/attachment.html>