[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] [registration-issues-wg] Subsequent Procedures

[Maureen Hilyard]

 So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH HEMISPHERE

And focus on making a splash in the Pacific region as well..

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda.scartezini at gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
>
> Some comments on Christopher points
>
> a) Community Priority Evaluations
> what was relevant during 2012 was the fact that all the effort asked for
> community to prove support ( ltos of money to do this around the world )
> was ignored during the analysis period and several community ( I have
> promoted few) faced auction though their competitors had no prove of
> community interest.
> Then, if we will impose some demands to community we need to make sure
> those items will be considered and none without similar qualifications will
> be compete with them.
>
> b)metrics
> Metrics for end users are security, respect to privacy and " continuity".
> If organization has no capacity to support initial investment so it will
> fail in a couple years and all registrant had done to promote the new
> domain will be waste of money.
>
>  I have been promoting here 2012 round. But it was this, myself talking
> with several organizations to enter. We had a reasonable success but the
> reality was there was NO PROMOTION of 2012 round in the South Hemisphere.
> Nothing in digital news in local languages. ICANN came one day to Sao Paulo
> Brazil and I asked people to join - we got 50 attendees . We had 8 ( from
> 11 applied in Brazil)  that attended this meeting . Nothing else was done
> in South America.
>  When I have done a survey in 2015 talking with big companies around South
> America I found just 1 that said they have no intention to apply if there
> was another round, all others responded YES, they had interest, please
> alert us, if there will be another round.
> So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH HEMISPHERE
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> Polo Consultores Associados
> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
> Sorry for any typos.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/8/18, 07:49, "GTLD-WG on behalf of wilkinson christopher" <
> gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of
> cw at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
>
>     Good afternoon:
>
>     I generally concur with Holly's priorities in addition to my questions
> regarding Competition and Jurisdiction.
>
>     Regards
>
>     CW
>
>
>     > El 8 de agosto de 2018 a las 7:09 Holly Raiche <
> h.raiche at internode.on.net> escribió:
>     >
>     >
>     > Folks
>     >
>     > Having gone through the Report and Appendix C, the issues that ALAC
> has been concerned with before and - I am suggesting - should concentrate
> on in its response include:
>     >
>     > Community Priority Evaluations
>     > These applicants had priority, but the definition was narrow and few
> applications made it through on this. The definition needs to be revisited,
> and the evaluation more transparent and predictable- and finalised BEFORE
> evaluation
>     >
>     > Metrics
>     > Unde the general heading, the question is asked whether there should
> be success metrics.  We said - and I believe should continue to say - have
> metrics as to what success looks like from an ALAC perspective.
>     >
>     > PICS
>     > Under global public interest, the question is asked whether there
> should continue to be PICS.  They are there because we argued for them -
> and still should
>     >
>     > Applications from outside the US/Europe
>     > We expressed concern that most of the applications came from the US
> and, to a lesser extent, Europe.  We said this came down to a number of
> factors, including
>     > Length and complexity of Applicant Guidebook - it should be more
> accessible, comprehensible, in different languages
>     > Need for applicant support - maybe a dedicated round for developing
> countries
>     > Possibility of variable fees
>     > IDNs
>     > The report mentions need for further work to be done on Universal
> Acceptance
>     >
>     >
>     > Happy to discuss
>     >
>     > Holly
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > CPWG mailing list
>     > CPWG at icann.org
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > registration-issues-wg mailing list
>     > registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>     _______________________________________________
>     CPWG mailing list
>     CPWG at icann.org
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>     _______________________________________________
>     GTLD-WG mailing list
>     GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>
>     Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/
> display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20180808/aa203ef0/attachment.html>