[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] [registration-issues-wg] Subsequent Procedures
Michele Neylon - Blacknight
michele at blacknight.com
Wed Aug 8 17:59:10 UTC 2018
It's not just the Southern hemisphere
We were approached by companies and government agencies *after* the application window was closed.
The general awareness of new TLDs outside the "bubble" is a problem.
It's not just language, though I agree that it is an important factor.
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com
https://blacknight.blog /
http://ceo.hosting/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow, R93 X265
,Ireland Company No.: 370845
On 08/08/2018, 18:14, "GTLD-WG on behalf of Maureen Hilyard" <gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> wrote:
So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH HEMISPHERE
And focus on making a splash in the Pacific region as well..
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda.scartezini at gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Some comments on Christopher points
>
> a) Community Priority Evaluations
> what was relevant during 2012 was the fact that all the effort asked for
> community to prove support ( ltos of money to do this around the world )
> was ignored during the analysis period and several community ( I have
> promoted few) faced auction though their competitors had no prove of
> community interest.
> Then, if we will impose some demands to community we need to make sure
> those items will be considered and none without similar qualifications will
> be compete with them.
>
> b)metrics
> Metrics for end users are security, respect to privacy and " continuity".
> If organization has no capacity to support initial investment so it will
> fail in a couple years and all registrant had done to promote the new
> domain will be waste of money.
>
> I have been promoting here 2012 round. But it was this, myself talking
> with several organizations to enter. We had a reasonable success but the
> reality was there was NO PROMOTION of 2012 round in the South Hemisphere.
> Nothing in digital news in local languages. ICANN came one day to Sao Paulo
> Brazil and I asked people to join - we got 50 attendees . We had 8 ( from
> 11 applied in Brazil) that attended this meeting . Nothing else was done
> in South America.
> When I have done a survey in 2015 talking with big companies around South
> America I found just 1 that said they have no intention to apply if there
> was another round, all others responded YES, they had interest, please
> alert us, if there will be another round.
> So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH HEMISPHERE
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> Polo Consultores Associados
> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
> Sorry for any typos.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/8/18, 07:49, "GTLD-WG on behalf of wilkinson christopher" <
> gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of
> cw at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
>
> Good afternoon:
>
> I generally concur with Holly's priorities in addition to my questions
> regarding Competition and Jurisdiction.
>
> Regards
>
> CW
>
>
> > El 8 de agosto de 2018 a las 7:09 Holly Raiche <
> h.raiche at internode.on.net> escribió:
> >
> >
> > Folks
> >
> > Having gone through the Report and Appendix C, the issues that ALAC
> has been concerned with before and - I am suggesting - should concentrate
> on in its response include:
> >
> > Community Priority Evaluations
> > These applicants had priority, but the definition was narrow and few
> applications made it through on this. The definition needs to be revisited,
> and the evaluation more transparent and predictable- and finalised BEFORE
> evaluation
> >
> > Metrics
> > Unde the general heading, the question is asked whether there should
> be success metrics. We said - and I believe should continue to say - have
> metrics as to what success looks like from an ALAC perspective.
> >
> > PICS
> > Under global public interest, the question is asked whether there
> should continue to be PICS. They are there because we argued for them -
> and still should
> >
> > Applications from outside the US/Europe
> > We expressed concern that most of the applications came from the US
> and, to a lesser extent, Europe. We said this came down to a number of
> factors, including
> > Length and complexity of Applicant Guidebook - it should be more
> accessible, comprehensible, in different languages
> > Need for applicant support - maybe a dedicated round for developing
> countries
> > Possibility of variable fees
> > IDNs
> > The report mentions need for further work to be done on Universal
> Acceptance
> >
> >
> > Happy to discuss
> >
> > Holly
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CPWG mailing list
> > CPWG at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> > _______________________________________________
> > registration-issues-wg mailing list
> > registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>
> Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/
> display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list