[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] [registration-issues-wg] Subsequent Procedures
Marita Moll
mmoll at ca.inter.net
Wed Aug 8 18:14:36 UTC 2018
I agree with Holly's points, and the further clarifications. Promotion,
including adequate advance notice, were clearly missing last time
around. It has also been suggested in other threads that, once ICANN
moves beyond rounds to continuous availability, this problem could
become even more acute. So it should be given lots of consideration
during this series of discussions.
Marita
On 8/8/2018 7:59 PM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
> It's not just the Southern hemisphere
>
> We were approached by companies and government agencies *after* the application window was closed.
>
> The general awareness of new TLDs outside the "bubble" is a problem.
>
> It's not just language, though I agree that it is an important factor.
>
> --
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
> https://www.blacknight.com
> https://blacknight.blog /
> http://ceo.hosting/
> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow, R93 X265
> ,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>
> On 08/08/2018, 18:14, "GTLD-WG on behalf of Maureen Hilyard" <gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH HEMISPHERE
>
> And focus on making a splash in the Pacific region as well..
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda.scartezini at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Some comments on Christopher points
> >
> > a) Community Priority Evaluations
> > what was relevant during 2012 was the fact that all the effort asked for
> > community to prove support ( ltos of money to do this around the world )
> > was ignored during the analysis period and several community ( I have
> > promoted few) faced auction though their competitors had no prove of
> > community interest.
> > Then, if we will impose some demands to community we need to make sure
> > those items will be considered and none without similar qualifications will
> > be compete with them.
> >
> > b)metrics
> > Metrics for end users are security, respect to privacy and " continuity".
> > If organization has no capacity to support initial investment so it will
> > fail in a couple years and all registrant had done to promote the new
> > domain will be waste of money.
> >
> > I have been promoting here 2012 round. But it was this, myself talking
> > with several organizations to enter. We had a reasonable success but the
> > reality was there was NO PROMOTION of 2012 round in the South Hemisphere.
> > Nothing in digital news in local languages. ICANN came one day to Sao Paulo
> > Brazil and I asked people to join - we got 50 attendees . We had 8 ( from
> > 11 applied in Brazil) that attended this meeting . Nothing else was done
> > in South America.
> > When I have done a survey in 2015 talking with big companies around South
> > America I found just 1 that said they have no intention to apply if there
> > was another round, all others responded YES, they had interest, please
> > alert us, if there will be another round.
> > So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH HEMISPHERE
> >
> > Vanda Scartezini
> > Polo Consultores Associados
> > Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
> > 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
> > Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
> > Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
> > Sorry for any typos.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/8/18, 07:49, "GTLD-WG on behalf of wilkinson christopher" <
> > gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of
> > cw at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Good afternoon:
> >
> > I generally concur with Holly's priorities in addition to my questions
> > regarding Competition and Jurisdiction.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > CW
> >
> >
> > > El 8 de agosto de 2018 a las 7:09 Holly Raiche <
> > h.raiche at internode.on.net> escribió:
> > >
> > >
> > > Folks
> > >
> > > Having gone through the Report and Appendix C, the issues that ALAC
> > has been concerned with before and - I am suggesting - should concentrate
> > on in its response include:
> > >
> > > Community Priority Evaluations
> > > These applicants had priority, but the definition was narrow and few
> > applications made it through on this. The definition needs to be revisited,
> > and the evaluation more transparent and predictable- and finalised BEFORE
> > evaluation
> > >
> > > Metrics
> > > Unde the general heading, the question is asked whether there should
> > be success metrics. We said - and I believe should continue to say - have
> > metrics as to what success looks like from an ALAC perspective.
> > >
> > > PICS
> > > Under global public interest, the question is asked whether there
> > should continue to be PICS. They are there because we argued for them -
> > and still should
> > >
> > > Applications from outside the US/Europe
> > > We expressed concern that most of the applications came from the US
> > and, to a lesser extent, Europe. We said this came down to a number of
> > factors, including
> > > Length and complexity of Applicant Guidebook - it should be more
> > accessible, comprehensible, in different languages
> > > Need for applicant support - maybe a dedicated round for developing
> > countries
> > > Possibility of variable fees
> > > IDNs
> > > The report mentions need for further work to be done on Universal
> > Acceptance
> > >
> > >
> > > Happy to discuss
> > >
> > > Holly
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CPWG mailing list
> > > CPWG at icann.org
> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > registration-issues-wg mailing list
> > > registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
> > _______________________________________________
> > CPWG mailing list
> > CPWG at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> > _______________________________________________
> > GTLD-WG mailing list
> > GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
> >
> > Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/
> > display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
> > _______________________________________________
> > CPWG mailing list
> > CPWG at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>
> Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20180808/8706109f/attachment.html>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list