[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] [registration-issues-wg] Subsequent Procedures

Fatimata Seye Sylla fsylla at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 08:59:38 UTC 2018


I concur with Holly and also with Vanda except that the focus should be on
all developing countries.

Fatimata

2018-08-08 18:14 GMT+00:00 Marita Moll <mmoll at ca.inter.net>:

> I agree with Holly's points, and the further clarifications. Promotion,
> including adequate advance notice, were clearly missing last time around.
> It has also been suggested in other threads that, once ICANN moves beyond
> rounds to continuous availability, this problem could become even more
> acute. So it should be given lots of consideration during this series of
> discussions.
>
> Marita
>
>
> On 8/8/2018 7:59 PM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>
>> It's not just the Southern hemisphere
>>
>> We were approached by companies and government agencies *after* the
>> application window was closed.
>>
>> The general awareness of new TLDs outside the "bubble" is a problem.
>>
>> It's not just language, though I agree that it is an important factor.
>>
>> --
>> Mr Michele Neylon
>> Blacknight Solutions
>> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>> https://www.blacknight.com
>> https://blacknight.blog /
>> http://ceo.hosting/
>> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
>> Park,Sleaty
>>
>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow, R93 X265
>> ,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>>
>> On 08/08/2018, 18:14, "GTLD-WG on behalf of Maureen Hilyard" <
>> gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of
>> maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>       So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH
>> HEMISPHERE
>>           And focus on making a splash in the Pacific region as well..
>>           On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Vanda Scartezini <
>> vanda.scartezini at gmail.com
>>      > wrote:
>>           >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > Some comments on Christopher points
>>      >
>>      > a) Community Priority Evaluations
>>      > what was relevant during 2012 was the fact that all the effort
>> asked for
>>      > community to prove support ( ltos of money to do this around the
>> world )
>>      > was ignored during the analysis period and several community ( I
>> have
>>      > promoted few) faced auction though their competitors had no prove
>> of
>>      > community interest.
>>      > Then, if we will impose some demands to community we need to make
>> sure
>>      > those items will be considered and none without similar
>> qualifications will
>>      > be compete with them.
>>      >
>>      > b)metrics
>>      > Metrics for end users are security, respect to privacy and "
>> continuity".
>>      > If organization has no capacity to support initial investment so
>> it will
>>      > fail in a couple years and all registrant had done to promote the
>> new
>>      > domain will be waste of money.
>>      >
>>      >  I have been promoting here 2012 round. But it was this, myself
>> talking
>>      > with several organizations to enter. We had a reasonable success
>> but the
>>      > reality was there was NO PROMOTION of 2012 round in the South
>> Hemisphere.
>>      > Nothing in digital news in local languages. ICANN came one day to
>> Sao Paulo
>>      > Brazil and I asked people to join - we got 50 attendees . We had 8
>> ( from
>>      > 11 applied in Brazil)  that attended this meeting . Nothing else
>> was done
>>      > in South America.
>>      >  When I have done a survey in 2015 talking with big companies
>> around South
>>      > America I found just 1 that said they have no intention to apply
>> if there
>>      > was another round, all others responded YES, they had interest,
>> please
>>      > alert us, if there will be another round.
>>      > So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH
>> HEMISPHERE
>>      >
>>      > Vanda Scartezini
>>      > Polo Consultores Associados
>>      > Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
>>      > 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
>>      > Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
>>      > Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
>>      > Sorry for any typos.
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > On 8/8/18, 07:49, "GTLD-WG on behalf of wilkinson christopher" <
>>      > gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of
>>      > cw at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
>>      >
>>      >     Good afternoon:
>>      >
>>      >     I generally concur with Holly's priorities in addition to my
>> questions
>>      > regarding Competition and Jurisdiction.
>>      >
>>      >     Regards
>>      >
>>      >     CW
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >     > El 8 de agosto de 2018 a las 7:09 Holly Raiche <
>>      > h.raiche at internode.on.net> escribió:
>>      >     >
>>      >     >
>>      >     > Folks
>>      >     >
>>      >     > Having gone through the Report and Appendix C, the issues
>> that ALAC
>>      > has been concerned with before and - I am suggesting - should
>> concentrate
>>      > on in its response include:
>>      >     >
>>      >     > Community Priority Evaluations
>>      >     > These applicants had priority, but the definition was narrow
>> and few
>>      > applications made it through on this. The definition needs to be
>> revisited,
>>      > and the evaluation more transparent and predictable- and finalised
>> BEFORE
>>      > evaluation
>>      >     >
>>      >     > Metrics
>>      >     > Unde the general heading, the question is asked whether
>> there should
>>      > be success metrics.  We said - and I believe should continue to
>> say - have
>>      > metrics as to what success looks like from an ALAC perspective.
>>      >     >
>>      >     > PICS
>>      >     > Under global public interest, the question is asked whether
>> there
>>      > should continue to be PICS.  They are there because we argued for
>> them -
>>      > and still should
>>      >     >
>>      >     > Applications from outside the US/Europe
>>      >     > We expressed concern that most of the applications came from
>> the US
>>      > and, to a lesser extent, Europe.  We said this came down to a
>> number of
>>      > factors, including
>>      >     > Length and complexity of Applicant Guidebook - it should be
>> more
>>      > accessible, comprehensible, in different languages
>>      >     > Need for applicant support - maybe a dedicated round for
>> developing
>>      > countries
>>      >     > Possibility of variable fees
>>      >     > IDNs
>>      >     > The report mentions need for further work to be done on
>> Universal
>>      > Acceptance
>>      >     >
>>      >     >
>>      >     > Happy to discuss
>>      >     >
>>      >     > Holly
>>      >     >
>>      >     >
>>      >     >
>>      >     >
>>      >     > _______________________________________________
>>      >     > CPWG mailing list
>>      >     > CPWG at icann.org
>>      >     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>      >     > _______________________________________________
>>      >     > registration-issues-wg mailing list
>>      >     > registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>      >     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>>      >     _______________________________________________
>>      >     CPWG mailing list
>>      >     CPWG at icann.org
>>      >     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>      >     _______________________________________________
>>      >     GTLD-WG mailing list
>>      >     GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>      >     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>>      >
>>      >     Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/
>>      > display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
>>      > _______________________________________________
>>      > CPWG mailing list
>>      > CPWG at icann.org
>>      > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>      >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> GTLD-WG mailing list
>> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>>
>> Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/di
>> splay/atlarge/New+GTLDs
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>
> Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/
> display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
>



-- 
Fatimata Seye Sylla
ICT4D, Education & Genre
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20180809/0301e3b6/attachment.html>


More information about the CPWG mailing list