[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] [registration-issues-wg] Subsequent Procedures
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
ocl at gih.com
Fri Aug 10 14:41:47 UTC 2018
Thanks for all of this story Vanda.
You know, the sad thing about this is that, in those days when Rod was
CEO, I confronted him about this and he made it quite clear that this
was a clear business decision. The ICANN roadshow went to the "markets"
it thought would generate huge interest and concrete applications.
I gather that times have changed now, but I would be interested to find
out if the current ICANN CEO and the Board still see the new gTLD round
as a set of "markets" to address, rather than basing the round on the
public interest.
Kindest regards,
Olivier
On 08/08/2018 19:13, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
> So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH HEMISPHERE
>
> And focus on making a splash in the Pacific region as well..
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Vanda Scartezini
> <vanda.scartezini at gmail.com <mailto:vanda.scartezini at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Some comments on Christopher points
>
> a) Community Priority Evaluations
> what was relevant during 2012 was the fact that all the effort
> asked for community to prove support ( ltos of money to do this
> around the world ) was ignored during the analysis period and
> several community ( I have promoted few) faced auction though
> their competitors had no prove of community interest.
> Then, if we will impose some demands to community we need to make
> sure those items will be considered and none without similar
> qualifications will be compete with them.
>
> b)metrics
> Metrics for end users are security, respect to privacy and "
> continuity". If organization has no capacity to support initial
> investment so it will fail in a couple years and all registrant
> had done to promote the new domain will be waste of money.
>
> I have been promoting here 2012 round. But it was this, myself
> talking with several organizations to enter. We had a reasonable
> success but the reality was there was NO PROMOTION of 2012 round
> in the South Hemisphere. Nothing in digital news in local
> languages. ICANN came one day to Sao Paulo Brazil and I asked
> people to join - we got 50 attendees . We had 8 ( from 11 applied
> in Brazil) that attended this meeting . Nothing else was done in
> South America.
> When I have done a survey in 2015 talking with big companies
> around South America I found just 1 that said they have no
> intention to apply if there was another round, all others
> responded YES, they had interest, please alert us, if there will
> be another round.
> So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH
> HEMISPHERE
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> Polo Consultores Associados
> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
> Sorry for any typos.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/8/18, 07:49, "GTLD-WG on behalf of wilkinson christopher"
> <gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of
> cw at christopherwilkinson.eu <mailto:cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>> wrote:
>
> Good afternoon:
>
> I generally concur with Holly's priorities in addition to my
> questions regarding Competition and Jurisdiction.
>
> Regards
>
> CW
>
>
> > El 8 de agosto de 2018 a las 7:09 Holly Raiche
> <h.raiche at internode.on.net <mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>>
> escribió:
> >
> >
> > Folks
> >
> > Having gone through the Report and Appendix C, the issues
> that ALAC has been concerned with before and - I am suggesting -
> should concentrate on in its response include:
> >
> > Community Priority Evaluations
> > These applicants had priority, but the definition was narrow
> and few applications made it through on this. The definition needs
> to be revisited, and the evaluation more transparent and
> predictable- and finalised BEFORE evaluation
> >
> > Metrics
> > Unde the general heading, the question is asked whether
> there should be success metrics. We said - and I believe should
> continue to say - have metrics as to what success looks like from
> an ALAC perspective.
> >
> > PICS
> > Under global public interest, the question is asked whether
> there should continue to be PICS. They are there because we
> argued for them - and still should
> >
> > Applications from outside the US/Europe
> > We expressed concern that most of the applications came from
> the US and, to a lesser extent, Europe. We said this came down to
> a number of factors, including
> > Length and complexity of Applicant Guidebook - it should be
> more accessible, comprehensible, in different languages
> > Need for applicant support - maybe a dedicated round for
> developing countries
> > Possibility of variable fees
> > IDNs
> > The report mentions need for further work to be done on
> Universal Acceptance
> >
> >
> > Happy to discuss
> >
> > Holly
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CPWG mailing list
> > CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg>
> > _______________________________________________
> > registration-issues-wg mailing list
> > registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg>
> _______________________________________________
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
> <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg>
>
> Working Group direct URL:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20180810/d6c3d768/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list