[CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] [GTLD-WG] WIPO FAQ page on GDPR and its impact on the UDRP.
gtheo
gtheo at xs4all.nl
Mon Sep 3 07:32:49 UTC 2018
You can easily zoom in on the cases and the decisions by WIPO;
http://www.wipo.int/rss/index.xml?col=dnddocs
Out of interest, how do you actually determine 1? 2,3,4 are
self-explanatory and cybersquatting is an issue for a lot of actors
within the DNS ecosystem and a complex one to solve.
Best,
Theo
Greg Shatan schreef op 2018-09-03 06:12 AM:
> I'm not sure what you mean by this, since UDRP cases aren't "solved".
>
> It's unclear whether this statistic is the number of cases filed each
> month, or the number of cases decided each month. But that doesn't
> really
> matter.
>
> UDRP cases can be filed even in the absence of information regarding
> the
> identity of the registrant. That's not the issue, and I don't believe
> there were any claims that WHOIS partly "going dark" would result in
> fewer
> cases being filed. If anything, more cases (but not better cases) may
> be
> filed (see #1 below).
>
> The issues that are caused by lack of registrant information include
> the
> following:
>
> 1. The potential complainant won't be able to tell whether the
> registrant
> may have a legitimate interest in the domain name, and whether that
> right
> predates the complainant's rights. This could result in cases being
> filed
> that wouldn't be filed with better information.
> 2. The potential complainant will have a much tougher time determining
> whether the registrant engages in a pattern and practice of
> cybersquatting
> (since the identity of the registrant will not be known at the time of
> the
> complaint).
> 3. The potential complainant will have a much tougher time determining
> whether other infringing domain names are owned by the same registrant.
> 4. It will be more difficult to consolidate cases, since it won't be
> immediately clear that domains in different are under common control.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 3:33 AM gtheo <gtheo at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>> So far the numbers of solved UDRP's under the GDPR regime remains the
>> same compared to last year.
>>
>> http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/statistics/cases_yr.jsp?year=2018
>>
>> WIPO has a lot of statistics;
>> http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/statistics/
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Theo Geurts
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dev Anand Teelucksingh schreef op 2018-08-26 09:04 PM:
>> > the WIPO Center has produced the present Q&A on the GDPR’s relation
>> > to the UDRP.
>> >
>> > http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/gdpr/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CPWG mailing list
>> > CPWG at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > registration-issues-wg mailing list
>> > registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> GTLD-WG mailing list
>> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>>
>> Working Group direct URL:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
More information about the CPWG
mailing list