[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] [registration-issues-wg] renewal of .org registry
Marita Moll
mmoll at ca.inter.net
Fri Apr 26 18:55:03 UTC 2019
Yes, sorry for innocently starting this up. But it has been interesting
to see the level of interest.
Marita
On 4/26/2019 8:42 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
> Well said JZ...
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019, 04:11 Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org
> <mailto:JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>> wrote:
>
> Folks,
> Let's table this discussion until we can have a more thorough
> exploration of the issues. Email is a terrible way in which to
> have such a discussion. Threads get lost, broken, etc. and
> everyone is looking at this from a very narrow perspective. We owe
> it to our constituency to take a broader view and to spend the
> time getting it right.
> Jonathan
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* GTLD-WG <gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org>> on behalf of
> Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com
> <mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 26, 2019 1:27 PM
> *To:* George Kirikos
> *Cc:* CPWG
> *Subject:* Re: [GTLD-WG] [CPWG] renewal of .org registry
> George
>
> Are these end-user issues that apply to the comment that the CPWG
> initially proposed to add to the registry submissions about the
> pricing of domains? We seem to have gotten a bit off track.
>
> Maureen
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:35 AM George Kirikos <icann at leap.com
> <mailto:icann at leap.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:57 AM Greg Shatan <greg at isoc-ny.org
> <mailto:greg at isoc-ny.org>> wrote:
> > Finally, this concern about protecting small non-profits
> from paying big bucks for domain names would seem a lot more
> genuine if it included support for price caps in the resale
> market (i.e., the secondary market or aftermarket).
>
> You're conflating 2 different issues, Greg. The registry operators
> charge *fees* for registry services (i.e. managing a central
> database,
> the zone file, the nameservers that spit back the nameservers
> for the
> various domain names in that registry). The market value of those
> services are below $1/yr/domain (e.g. 70 cents per domain per
> year for
> the .IN ccTLD, as per their recent tender won by Neustar).
>
> http://domainincite.com/23976-neustar-completes-in-migration
>
> The secondary market or aftermarket is a marketplace for the asset
> value of the domain names themselves, which is an entirely
> different
> market than that for registry services.
>
> To understand this distinction, consider a trademark registry,
> like
> the USPTO, which has a fee structure for the services they
> provide for
> the registration and maintenance of trademarks. Those fees are
> entirely unrelated to the value of the trademark itself. A
> trademark
> owned by Google for "GOOGLE" or by Nike for "JUST DO IT" has
> set fees,
> and Google or Nike are free to sell, assign, license, etc. those
> trademarks to others at whatever the market will bear.
> Companies like
> Hilco Streambank routinely auction off the IP of companies,
> including
> their trademarks, see:
>
> https://www.hilcostreambank.com/closed-deals
>
> and of course, owners of TMs do these kinds of transactions
> all the
> time. For example, Hooters sold their trademark for $60 million.
>
> https://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/stories/2001/04/09/story1.html
>
> The same comparison exists for a land registry and houses. Or a
> copyright registry, and the copyrighted works. The story of the
> Beatles catalog makes interesting reading:
>
> https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/rock/7662519/beatles-catalog-paul-mccartney-brief-history-ownership
>
> and that catalog only has value due to the copyrights (once those
> copyrights expire, the works fall into the public domain, and the
> works are free for everyone to use).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> 416-588-0269
> http://www.leap.com/
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>
> Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20190426/9905411f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list