[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] Fw: Cooperation with the GAC

[Marita Moll]

Hi Yrjo. I would attend such a call -- depending on the date and time.


Marita


On 9/16/2019 11:39 PM, Yrjö Länsipuro wrote:
> Dear CPWG members,
>
> Please indicate whether you would like to participate in an 
> intersessional call with interested GAC members on policy cooperation 
> (discussed on the CPWG call 28 August, see summary below) before ICABB66.
>
> Best,
>
> Yrjö
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Yrjö Länsipuro <yrjo_lansipuro at hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 6, 2019 4:57 PM
> *To:* cpwg at icann.org <cpwg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Cooperation with the GAC
> Dear all,
>
> With my thanks to all who participated in the discussion on policy 
> cooperation with the GAC atthe CPWG meeting28 August, here’s my summary:
>
>   * Cooperation was seen as useful and expanding it into policy areas
>     worth exploring, looking for issues where we agree and can find
>     common interests.“How and where can the interests of the end users
>     benefit from this cooperation” was suggested as a criterion to
>     inform us about topics to embark on. Addressing issues where the
>     opinions ofthe two groups are already closeto each other is to be
>     preferred. Trying to convince each other on issues we disagree
>     upon is not a good use of our time.
>
>   * The need to retain our identity and to avoid perceptions of our
>     being “an arm” of another stakeholder group was stressed.On the
>     other hand, when our ideas with another group do align, we should
>     not shy away from saying we agree with them.
>
>   * As to concrete issues for the policy dialogue with the GAC, the
>     ones that already have been subject to discussions at numerous
>     joint ALAC-GAC meetings – EPDP and SubPro – were mentioned. As a
>     third topic, survival of multistakeholderism in the ICANN context
>     was suggested.
>
>   * On SubPro,a couple of paths for dialogue came up:
>
>       o GeoNames where (in spite of the lack of consensus both inside
>         At-Large and the GAC), it might be worth exploring the extent
>         to the overlap , the subset of issues that both might agree
>         upon.In this connection, the default role of the 2012 AGB was
>         mentioned, whether going back to it on many issues would be
>         preferable compared to alternatives that have been proposed.
>
>       o Global public interests and safeguards (highly regulated
>         sectors, verified TLD’s, registration restrictions, DNS
>         abuse).This topic would include whether SubPro PDP has
>         properly addressed the CCT recommendations that need to be
>         implemented before another new gTLD round.
>
>   * The need for “getting our own act together” was recognized on
>     issues where there is no internal ALAC/At-Large consensus at present.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Yrjö
>
> -
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>
> Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20190917/658584a7/attachment.html>