[CPWG] ALAC EPDP Statement Addendum - v03

[Jonathan Zuck]

Well, it should either be both or neither but we don’t need to obsess over it. 😉

From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
Date: Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 5:56 PM
To: Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>
Cc: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>, "Matthias M. Hudobnik" <matthias at hudobnik.at>, CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CPWG] ALAC EPDP Statement Addendum - v03

Folks

A comma (in red) that should not be there. Otherwise, perfect

Holly




On Aug 21, 2020, at 1:04 AM, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org<mailto:JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>> wrote:

When you mentioned grammarians, I couldn't resist so I did a full edit. I hope it's helpful.

=======================
The members of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) appreciate the opportunity to submit this addendum to the statement that was submitted on 29 July 2020.

The ALAC, along with its EPDP team, has reviewed and discussed the statements submitted by the BC/IPC, the consensus positions submitted by the GAC and SSAC and comments submitted by the other EPDP Member groups.

Although the ALAC statement differs in approach, the ALAC is in general agreement with the positions taken by the GAC, SSAC and BC/IPC.  The ALAC has chosen to dissent with the recommendations, that required a year of heated debate to produce, with some trepidation. However, proceeding without addressing the issues that, we believe, are critical to the success of an SSAD will result in a system that will not meet needs of SSAD users nor provide the mechanism to resolve those deficiencies in the future. We hope that the GNSO and, if necessary, the Board will consider these unresolved issues as this approval process moves forward.
========================

On 8/20/20, 10:41 AM, "CPWG on behalf of Alan Greenberg" <cpwg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cpwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> wrote:

   I think that DEBATE is correct in this case. As in the title of this
   Wall Street Journal article - After Years of Debate -
   https://www.wsj.com/articles/after-years-of-debate-confederate-symbols-disappear-quickly-11591905565.

   Any grammarians out there??

   Alan

   At 2020-08-20 03:32 AM, Matthias M. Hudobnik wrote:

Thanks Alan!

Just a minor change recommendation from my side:

   _______________________________________________
   CPWG mailing list
   CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
   https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

   _______________________________________________
   By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200820/8a9b7794/attachment.html>