[CPWG] ALAC EPDP Statement Addendum - v03

[Alan Greenberg]

Thanks Jonathan,

Unfortunately in a several of places, your 
revision changes the meaning/intent. I'll send a 
revision merging the two shortly. Hopefully the final version.

As an aside, I have not sensed any "trepidation" 
in our community. Sadness and regret that it has 
come to this is more what I have felt.

Alan

At 2020-08-20 11:04 AM, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
>When you mentioned grammarians, I couldn't 
>resist so I did a full edit. I hope it's helpful.
>
>=======================
>The members of the At-Large Advisory Committee 
>(ALAC) appreciate the opportunity to submit this 
>addendum to the statement that was submitted on 29 July 2020.
>
>The ALAC, along with its EPDP team, has reviewed 
>and discussed the statements submitted by the 
>BC/IPC, the consensus positions submitted by the 
>GAC and SSAC and comments submitted by the other EPDP Member groups.
>
>Although the ALAC statement differs in approach, 
>the ALAC is in general agreement with the 
>positions taken by the GAC, SSAC and 
>BC/IPC.  The ALAC has chosen to dissent with the 
>recommendations, that required a year of heated 
>debate to produce, with some trepidation. 
>However, proceeding without addressing the 
>issues that, we believe, are critical to the 
>success of an SSAD will result in a system that 
>will not meet needs of SSAD users nor provide 
>the mechanism to resolve those deficiencies in 
>the future. We hope that the GNSO and, if 
>necessary, the Board will consider these 
>unresolved issues as this approval process moves forward.
>========================
>
>On 8/20/20, 10:41 AM, "CPWG on behalf of Alan 
>Greenberg" <cpwg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of 
>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>
>     I think that DEBATE is correct in this case. As in the title of this
>     Wall Street Journal article - After Years of Debate -
> 
>https://www.wsj.com/articles/after-years-of-debate-confederate-symbols-disappear-quickly-11591905565.
>
>     Any grammarians out there??
>
>     Alan
>
>     At 2020-08-20 03:32 AM, Matthias M. Hudobnik wrote:
>     >Thanks Alan!
>     >
>     >Just a minor change recommendation from my side:
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CPWG mailing list
>     CPWG at icann.org
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     By submitting your personal data, you 
> consent to the processing of your personal data 
> for purposes of subscribing to this mailing 
> list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy 
> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the 
> website Terms of Service 
> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can 
> visit the Mailman link above to change your 
> membership status or configuration, including 
> unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or 
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>_______________________________________________ 
>CPWG mailing list CPWG at icann.org 
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg 
>_______________________________________________ 
>By submitting your personal data, you consent to 
>the processing of your personal data for 
>purposes of subscribing to this mailing list 
>accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy 
>(https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the 
>website Terms of Service 
>(https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can 
>visit the Mailman link above to change your 
>membership status or configuration, including 
>unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or 
>disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.