[CPWG] GAC ICANN68 Communique

[Maureen Hilyard]

We can get Alan and Hadia to do a brief presentation at the next ALAC
meeting and then put a motion to the ALAC to formalise our support for the
GAC statement.

Heidi to add that to the agenda of the next meeting.

M


On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, 2:59 pm Evan Leibovitch, <evan at telly.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 20:07, Greg Shatan <greg at isoc-ny.org> wrote:
>
>> I think the only groups that are happy with the EPDP process are the
>> Contracted Parties
>>
>
> Too often in ICANN that's often enough to get something through. A
> concerted opposition by nearly everyone else (NCPH + ALAC+GAC) means the
> public interest has a fighting chance.
>
> I suggest that a small item in the next ALAC meeting include a formal
> endorsement of the GAC position if it's as aligned with ours as Alan says.
>
> - Evan
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200629/7a29549d/attachment-0001.html>